Ross v. Adam Associates et al

Filing 8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSERE FAILURE TO APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; FAILURE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2010)

Ross v. Adam Associates et al

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 4, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge FRANCOIS ROSS, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-2486 SI ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; FAILURE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAMS ASSOCIATES, KELLY SNYDER, MARTH DANIELS and LAURA PUTNAM, Defendants.

This matter came on for a regularly-scheduled case management conference on Friday, September 10, 2010. Plaintiff was present, but no defendant appeared. The record reflects that on July 13, 2010, the U.S. Marshals Service served process on each defendant at the address provided to them by plaintiff (351 H Avenue, Treasure Island, San Francisco, CA 94130). However, defendants have filed no appearance in the case, have filed no response to the complaint and have not otherwise contacted the Court about this matter. Accordingly, defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing filed with the Court and served on plaintiff no later than October 15, 2010, why they failed to appear and whether they intend to defend against this action. In the event an adequate response is not provided by October 15, 2010, plaintiff may request that default, and ultimately default judgment, be entered against defendants.

Dockets.Justia.com