Cobb v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
25
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 12/15/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/14/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
*E-Filed 11/14/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
12
13
14
15
No. C 10-02518 RS
TAVARES COBB,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
16
17
18
On September 28, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause in writing why this case
19
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was directed to file a written response by
20
November 10, 2011, and to appear at a hearing on November 17, 2011. On November 10, plaintiff’s
21
counsel filed a response stating that he had been unable to meet with plaintiff to discuss dismissal of
22
this matter prior to the deadline due to counsel’s own schedule and visiting restrictions at Santa Rita
23
jail, where plaintiff is incarcerated. According to plaintiff’s counsel, however, plaintiff will be
24
released on November 22, 2011. The order to show cause is therefore continued to December 15,
25
2011, to permit plaintiff’s counsel to communicate with client.
26
27
Cobb is directed to file a written response to the order to show cause by December 8, 2011,
and to appear for a hearing on December 15, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, 450
28
1
No. C 10-02518 RS
ORDER
1
Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco. Failure to file a response or to appear at the hearing will result in
2
dismissal of this action.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/14/2011
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
No. C 10-02518 RS
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?