Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
Filing
227
ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/6/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
GARY D. EASLEY,
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-2640 RS
ORDER
v.
15
16
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, et al.,
17
18
Defendants.
____________________________________/
19
20
Under the supervision of a magistrate judge, this action was settled in December of 2012.
21
The parties were subsequently ordered to file a stipulation of dismissal or to appear and show cause
22
why the matter should not be dismissed. The show cause hearing was held on May 2, 2013.
23
Plaintiff failed to appear. Defendants advise that they stand ready to pay plaintiff the settlement
24
sums, but that he has failed to execute the written settlement documents.
25
Plaintiff is directed to contact defendants and to make arrangements to sign the settlement
26
agreement and obtain the settlement proceeds immediately. The parties shall then file a dismissal
27
28
1
forthwith. If no dismissal is filed, this action will be dismissed with prejudice on May 31, 2013,
2
without further notice.1
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: 5/6/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Nothing in this order addresses the enforceability of the settlement in the event it is not fully
executed prior to any such dismissal.
2
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
2
3
4
Gary D. Easley
18525 Old Monterey Rd.
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
5
6
7
8
DATED: 5/6/13
/s/ Chambers Staff
Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?