Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al

Filing 227

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/6/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 GARY D. EASLEY, 13 14 Plaintiff, No. C 10-2640 RS ORDER v. 15 16 CITY OF MORGAN HILL, et al., 17 18 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 19 20 Under the supervision of a magistrate judge, this action was settled in December of 2012. 21 The parties were subsequently ordered to file a stipulation of dismissal or to appear and show cause 22 why the matter should not be dismissed. The show cause hearing was held on May 2, 2013. 23 Plaintiff failed to appear. Defendants advise that they stand ready to pay plaintiff the settlement 24 sums, but that he has failed to execute the written settlement documents. 25 Plaintiff is directed to contact defendants and to make arrangements to sign the settlement 26 agreement and obtain the settlement proceeds immediately. The parties shall then file a dismissal 27 28 1 forthwith. If no dismissal is filed, this action will be dismissed with prejudice on May 31, 2013, 2 without further notice.1 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 5/6/13 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Nothing in this order addresses the enforceability of the settlement in the event it is not fully executed prior to any such dismissal. 2 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: 2 3 4 Gary D. Easley 18525 Old Monterey Rd. Morgan Hill, CA 95037 5 6 7 8 DATED: 5/6/13 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?