Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
Filing
26
ORDER RE: 6 DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
Doc. 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
**E-filed 11/22/2010**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GARY D. EASLEY, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-2640 RS ORDER DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Plaintiff Gary D. Easley, appearing in pro se, submitted an amended complaint for filing, but it was entered into the ECF system as part of an unrelated document and was not separately docketed. Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that Easley's First Amended Complaint, which appears beginning at the fourth page of Docket No. 6 herein, shall be deemed the operative complaint in this action and shall be deemed to have been properly filed on August 20, 2010.
Dated:11/22/2010 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: 11/22/2010 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg Gary D. Easley 18525 Old Monterey Rd. Morgan Hill, CA 95037 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
* Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to any co-counsel who have not registered with the Court's electronic filing system.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?