Poole v. United States of America et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 08/03/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Judgment) (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2010)

Download PDF
Poole v. United States of America et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CRYSTAL ANN POOLE, Plaintiff, *E-Filed 08/03/2010* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION No. C 10-02668 RS ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ____________________________________/ On June 18, 2010, plaintiff Chrystal Ann Poole filed a Petition and Complaint to Quash IRS Third Party Summons as well as an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On June 24, 2010 the Court denied plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and ordered that plaintiff pay the filing fee of $350.00 no later than July 23, 2010. In its Order, the Court noted that the failure to pay the filing fee by July 23, 2010 may result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not paid the requisite filing fee, nor has she submitted any additional filings. Accordingly, this action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 08/03/2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NO. C 10-02668 RS ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: 08/03/2010 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg Crystal Ann Poole P.O. Box 6913 San Pablo, CA 94806-6913 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California * Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to any co-counsel who have not registered with the Court's electronic filing system. NO. C 10-01776 RS ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?