Zeyen v. California Department of Motor Vehicles

Filing 9

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than December 21, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation by December 21, 2010, this order will be discharged. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/7/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2010)

Zeyen v. California Department of Motor Vehicles

Doc. 9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 7, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant / By order filed June 23, 2010, the parties and counsel were ordered to hold, no later than October 1, 2010, a joint inspection of the premises at issue herein. (See Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial Of Right to Access Under ADA.) Further, plaintiff was ordered to file a Notice of Need for Mediation no later than 45 days after the joint site inspection. (See id.) To date, plaintiff has not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation or submitted any other filing in the matter. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than December 21, 2010, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files a Notice of Need for Mediation by December 21, 2010, this order will be discharged. IT IS SO ORDERED. RANDY ZEYEN, Plaintiff, No. C-10-2753 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com