Lai v. Napolitano et al

Filing 6

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 30, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2010)

Download PDF
Lai v. Napolitano et al Doc. 6 1 MELINDA HAAG, CSBN 132612 United States Attorney 2 J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Civil Division ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909 4 Assistant United States Attorney 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 10 11 12 AH MOI LAI, 13 14 v. P l aint i ff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-2755 WHA STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH THE DEFENDANTS MUST FILE AN ANSWER; and [proposed] ORDER 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7124 FAX: (415) 436-7169 15 J ANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; 16 ROBIN BARRETT, USCIS, San Francisco Field Office Director, 17 Defendant s . 18 19 Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys 20 of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a thirty-day extension of time 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 Stipulation to Extend Time C 10-2755 WHA 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 within which the Defendants must serve its answer in the above-entitled action. 2 Dated: August 23, 2010 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: August 23, 2010 10 11 12 ORDER 13 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants' Answer is now due September 28, 14 2010. 15 /s/ JUSTIN X. WANG Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ ILA C. DEISS Assistant United States Attorney Respectfully submitted, MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney UNIT ED 16 17 Date: August 30, 2010. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Extend Time C 10-2755 WHA S S DISTRICT TE C TA United States District Judge illia Judge W m Alsup ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 A C LI FO R NIA D RDERE S SO O IT I WILLIAM ALSUP RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?