Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al v. Centex Homes
Filing
345
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 214 Motion for Reconsideration. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. C 10-02757 CRB
TRAVELERS PROPERTY,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff,
v.
CENTEX HOMES,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Defendant Centex Homes moved the Court to reconsider its April 1, 2011 Order
18
denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff Travelers’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
19
See dkt. 214. Centex argued that (1) new evidence revealed a conflict of interest and (2) the
20
Court committed clear error in finding that Travelers was prejudiced. In advance of the
21
hearing on Centex’s motion, the Court issued an Argument Order, asking Centex to be
22
prepared to state whether it would permit Travelers to assume its defense in the underlying
23
actions from this point forward, provided the counsel appointed by Travelers was free of
24
conflicts. See dkt. 332. At the motion hearing, Centex answered the Court’s question in the
25
affirmative. And Travelers represented that it was prepared to provide such counsel.
26
In light of this development, the Court finds the following. First, the motion for
27
reconsideration is not ripe, and so it is DENIED, without prejudice. Second, the three
28
pending motions for partial summary judgment, dkts. 223, 232 and 242, are all VACATED,
1
as is the motion for consolidation of those motions, dkt. 300. Third, the parties are invited to
2
submit briefing on whether this case should be stayed while the underlying actions are
3
pending. The Court need not take any further action at this time.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 6, 2011
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2010\2757\order re reconsideration.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?