Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al v. Centex Homes

Filing 345

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 214 Motion for Reconsideration. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. C 10-02757 CRB TRAVELERS PROPERTY, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff, v. CENTEX HOMES, Defendant. / 16 17 Defendant Centex Homes moved the Court to reconsider its April 1, 2011 Order 18 denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff Travelers’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 19 See dkt. 214. Centex argued that (1) new evidence revealed a conflict of interest and (2) the 20 Court committed clear error in finding that Travelers was prejudiced. In advance of the 21 hearing on Centex’s motion, the Court issued an Argument Order, asking Centex to be 22 prepared to state whether it would permit Travelers to assume its defense in the underlying 23 actions from this point forward, provided the counsel appointed by Travelers was free of 24 conflicts. See dkt. 332. At the motion hearing, Centex answered the Court’s question in the 25 affirmative. And Travelers represented that it was prepared to provide such counsel. 26 In light of this development, the Court finds the following. First, the motion for 27 reconsideration is not ripe, and so it is DENIED, without prejudice. Second, the three 28 pending motions for partial summary judgment, dkts. 223, 232 and 242, are all VACATED, 1 as is the motion for consolidation of those motions, dkt. 300. Third, the parties are invited to 2 submit briefing on whether this case should be stayed while the underlying actions are 3 pending. The Court need not take any further action at this time. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 6, 2011 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2010\2757\order re reconsideration.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?