Ducharme v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law PLLC et al

Filing 13

ORDER continuing hearing re 12 Stipulation, filed by Mary Ducharme, 10 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing set for 10/1/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/2/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2010)

Download PDF
Ducharme v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law PLLC et al Doc. 13 Sean P. Reis (No. 184044) sreis@edelson.com 2 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 3 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 4 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 1 5 6 7 8 9 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARY DUCHARME, individually and Case No. CV-10-2763-CRB [Assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer] [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) 10 on behalf of a class of similarly situated 11 12 13 individuals, v. Plaintiff, 14 JOHN C. HEATH ATTORNEY AT 15 liability company d/b/a LEXINGTON 16 LAW, PLLC, a Utah professional limited LAW FIRM; ADAM C. FULLMAN, an individual d/b/a LEXINGTON LAW 17 FIRM CALIFORNIA, a registered California Credit Services Organization, 18 19 20 21 Defendants. Having considered the parties' Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) ("Motion to Dismiss"), the Court hereby 23 ORDERS: 24 The hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss is continued from September 3, 2010 to ISTRIC ES D TC AT T 25 October 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. RT U O Dated: Sept. 2, 2010 UNIT ED 26 27 28 S [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ER N C F D IS T IC T O R Dockets.Justia.com A LI FO Judge C harles R . Breyer R NIA Judge Charles R. Breyer IT IS S NO ERED O ORD RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?