Parry v. National Seating & Mobility Inc
Filing
61
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON RENEWED SCHEDULE ON RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: Case Management Statement due by 3/30/2012. Motions due by 12/30/2011. Replies due by 2/10/201 2. Responses due by 1/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/5/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NATIONAL SEATING & MOBILITY, INC.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 10-02782 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
12
MICHAEL PARRY, et al.,
13
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND SETTING HEARING DATE
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
Defendants.
14
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
/
15
16
The Court has received and considered the parties’ joint case management conference
17
statement and HEREBY CONTINUES the case management conference set for December 9,
18
2011 at 1:30 p.m. to April 6, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. The parties’ further joint case management
19
conference statement shall be due on March 30, 2012. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the
20
Court shall set a placeholder hearing date of February 24, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. for Parry’s renewed
21
motion for class certification. Parry shall file his motion on or before December 30, 2011.
22
NSM’s opposition brief shall be due by January 27, 2012, and Parry’s reply shall be due by
23
February 10, 2012. To the extent the parties have disputes about discovery, they shall follow
24
this Court’s standing order and shall present those disputes via letter brief.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?