Openwave Systems Inc. v. Myriad France S.A.S.
Filing
212
ORDER RE PRECIS RE DECLARATIONS re 206 Letter filed by Myriad France S.A.S.. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 4, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC.,
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE PRÉCIS
RE DECLARATIONS
MYRIAD FRANCE S.A.S.,
Defendant.
/
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
No. C 10-02805 WHA
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/
12
13
On May 3, Myriad filed a précis seeking leave to file an administrative motion to resubmit
14
the declarations of Cyrille Amar, Obie Oberoi, and Simon Wilkinson in support of Myriad’s
15
opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment. Each of the three declarations on file
16
concludes with the statement “I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
17
correct.” The resubmitted declarations would be unchanged substantively but would alter the
18
final sentence to read, “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
19
America that the foregoing is true and correct.” Myriad explains that the phrase “under the laws
20
of the United States of America” was inadvertently omitted from the filed declarations. Myriad
21
represents that Openwave refuses to stipulate to the submission of replacement declarations and
22
instead seeks an order excluding the declarations because of the missing words (Dkt. No. 206).
23
As a concession to the shortness of life, Myriad’s précis is hereby deemed an
24
administrative motion for leave to resubmit the declarations. Accordingly, Openwave may file an
25
opposition to the motion by MAY 9, 2011 if Openwave has any non-frivolous grounds for doing
26
so. Civ. L. R. 7-11(b).
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?