Gebhardt v. Chu et al
Filing
15
ORDER re 12 Declaration in Support filed by Steven Chu, 11 Declaration in Support filed by Steven Chu, 10 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Steven Chu. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on October 6, 2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2010)
Gebhardt v. Chu et al
Doc. 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
GARNETT A GEBHARDT v. STEVEN CHU Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ Plaintiff(s),
No. C 10-02807 MEJ ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS
On October 1, 2010, Defendant electronically filed a motion to dismiss and supporting documents. (Dkt. ##10-12.) However, Defendant has failed to comply with General Order 45 and the Court's Standing Orders by failing to deliver to the Clerk's Office "no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked `Chambers Copy' and . . . clearly marked with the judge's name, case number, and `Chambers Copy-Do Not File.'" See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Case Management Standing Order, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, ¶ 6. Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy, with exhibits and appropriate tab dividers if necessary, of the above-referenced documents. ALL CHAMBERS COPIES OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS MUST INCLUDE ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING HEADER CREATED BY THE ECF SYSTEM. IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: October 6, 2010
_______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?