Ottovich et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al

Filing 34

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 21, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)

Download PDF
Ottovich et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HARVEY OTTOVICH and MARK OTTOVICH, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC., and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, Defendants. / FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT No. C 10-02842 WHA SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. They noticed the motion for November 10, 2011 [sic], at 9:00 a.m. Presumably the year is a typo. Assuming it is, plaintiffs have noticed a motion for a Wednesday, even though the undersigned hears civil motions on Thursdays at 8:00 a.m. The Court's deputy left a message for the attorney for one of the plaintiffs (the other is representing himself pro se) to inform him that plaintiffs must renotice the motion, but they have not done so. Meanwhile, no opposition has been received, perhaps because of the confusion about when the motion will be heard. The motion hearing on November 10, 2011, is VACATED. The motion will be heard on NOVEMBER 18, 2010, AT 8:00 A.M. The deadlines for opposition and reply briefs shall be calculated according to the Civil Local Rules based on this new hearing date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?