Duncanson v. Royal & Sunalliance Group Life Insurance Policy

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING 60 Stipulation TO CONTINUE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION RE ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS AND PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT TO INTEREST ON THE PREMIUM PAID. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/4/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

Case3:10-cv-02898-JSW Document60 Filed12/27/11 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4

SEAN NALTY, ESQ. (SBN 121253)
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Real Party In Interest
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NORTH AMERICA

7
8
9
10

Laurence F. Padway, (SBN:89314)
Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway
1516 Oak Street, Suite 109
Alameda, California 94501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile : [phone]

11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

DEBRA DUNCANSON,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

v.
ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE GROUP LIFE
INSURANCE POLICY,

23
24

3:10-cv-02898-JSW

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO
CONTINUE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION RE
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND
PLAINTIFF’S ENTITLEMENT TO
INTEREST ON THE PREMIUM PAID AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant,
Honorable Jeffrey S. White

21
22

Case No.:

Action Filed :

June 30, 2010

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH
AMERICA,
Real Party In Interest.

25
26
27

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Motion re Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Entitlement
to Interest on the Premium Paid is due on December 29, 2011; and

28
1
USDC NDCA Case # 10-cv-02892-JSW
801940

Case3:10-cv-02898-JSW Document60 Filed12/27/11 Page2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6

Whereas, due to the holidays and the illness of plaintiff’s counsel, plaintiff has been
unable to prepare the motion;
Now, therefore, the parties stipulate that plaintiff may file her motion on January 19,
2012, defendants will file an opposition three weeks after the date of service of plaintiff’s motion, and
plaintiff's reply will be filed two weeks after defendants’ opposition is served on her. Plaintiff will
notice the motion for at least two weeks after the reply brief is filed.

7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
10

DATED: December 27, 2011

/s/ Laurence F. Padway_____________
Laurence F. Padway
Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway
Attorneys for plaintiff

DATED: December 27, 2011

/s/__Sean P. Nalty

11
12
13
14

_______

15
Sean P. Nalty
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman &
Dicker, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants & Real Party in Interest

16
17
18
19

ORDER

20
21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

January 3, 2012
Dated: ______________

___________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
Judge of the United States District Court

24
25
26
27
28

2
USDC NDCA Case # 10-cv-02892-JSW
801940