Duncanson v. Royal & Sunalliance Group Life Insurance Policy

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 8/5/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2010)

Duncanson v. Royal & Sunalliance Group Life Insurance Policy

Doc. 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

SEAN NALTY (SBN 121253) Email: [e-mail] SHIVANI NANDA (SBN 253891) Email: [e-mail] WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Real Party In Interest LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 Defendant, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON USDC NDCA Case # 10-cv-02892-BZ
568854.1

DEBRA DUNCANSON, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE GROUP LIFE INSURANCE POLICY,

Case No.:

3:10-cv-02898-BZ

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Honorable Bernard Zimmerman Action Filed : June 30, 2010

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Real Party In Interest.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, by and between plaintiff Debra Duncanson ("Plaintiff") and Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA), through their attorneys of record, as follows: 1. LINA was served with the Summons and Complaint on or about July 6, 2010. LINA's

response to the Complaint was originally due on or before July 23, 2010;

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2.

On July 23, 2010 Plaintiff and LINA filed a stiulation agreeing that LINA may have

an extension to and including August 6, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. On July 26, 2010, the Court filed an order granting the requst; 3. Plaintiff and LINA have agreed that LINA may have a second extension to and

including August 20, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;and 4. This extension of time to respond to the Complaint does not exceed thirty (30) days.

Date: August 4, 2010

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 By: Date: August 4, 2010

/s/ SHIVANI NANDA SEAN P. NALTY SHIVANI NANDA Attorneys for Real Party In Interest LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY

/s/ LAURENCE F. PADWAY__ LAURENCE F. PADWAY Attorney for Plaintiff DEBRA DUNCANSON

______

ORDER 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON USDC NDCA Case # 10-cv-02892-BZ
568854.1

Date: August 5, 2010

By: HONORABLE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE