Legrama et al v. America's Servicing Company et al
Filing
84
ORDER, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 59 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, 57 MOTION to Strike 55 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and A uthorities Motion to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent Allegation in the First Amended Complaint; Memorandum o MOTION to Strike 55 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Motion to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent Allegation in the First Amended Complaint; Memorandum o, 64 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Signature Group Holdings, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amende d Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Signature Group Holdings, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amende d Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities : Motion Hearing set for 7/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/9/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
Northern District of California
6
7
CHRISTINA LEGRAMA and HENRY
BANAGA, JR.,
No. C 10-2945 MEJ
8
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, et al.,
11
ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING
RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
ORDER DISCHARGING SECOND
OSC
13
Currently pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss and one motion to strike.
14
Dkt. Nos. 56, 57, 59, 64. As Plaintiffs had not filed any opposition to the pending motions, the
15
Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, including granting the
16
pending motions, for failure to comply with court deadlines. Dkt. No. 75. Although Plaintiffs did
17
not respond to the order to show cause, they did subsequently file oppositions to the motions.
18
Accordingly, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the order to show cause. The Court shall conduct a
19
hearing on the pending motions on July 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450
20
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: June 9, 2011
24
25
26
27
28
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
CHRISTINA LEGRAMA et al,
Case Number: CV10-02945 MEJ
4
Plaintiff,
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
6
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 9, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
16
Christina Legrama
Henry Banaga
67 Boxford Place
San Ramon, CA 94583
17
18
19
20
Dated: June 9, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?