Legrama et al v. America's Servicing Company et al

Filing 84

ORDER, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 59 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, 57 MOTION to Strike 55 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and A uthorities Motion to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent Allegation in the First Amended Complaint; Memorandum o MOTION to Strike 55 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Motion to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent Allegation in the First Amended Complaint; Memorandum o, 64 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Signature Group Holdings, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amende d Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Signature Group Holdings, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amende d Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities : Motion Hearing set for 7/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/9/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

CHRISTINA LEGRAMA and HENRY
BANAGA, JR.,

No. C 10-2945 MEJ

8
Plaintiffs,
9

v.
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, et al.,

11

ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING
RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

ORDER DISCHARGING SECOND
OSC

13
Currently pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss and one motion to strike.
14
Dkt. Nos. 56, 57, 59, 64. As Plaintiffs had not filed any opposition to the pending motions, the
15
Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, including granting the
16
pending motions, for failure to comply with court deadlines. Dkt. No. 75. Although Plaintiffs did
17
not respond to the order to show cause, they did subsequently file oppositions to the motions.
18
Accordingly, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the order to show cause. The Court shall conduct a
19
hearing on the pending motions on July 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450
20
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: June 9, 2011
24
25
26
27
28

_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1
2
3

CHRISTINA LEGRAMA et al,
Case Number: CV10-02945 MEJ

4
Plaintiff,
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.

6
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 9, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.

13
14
15
16

Christina Legrama
Henry Banaga
67 Boxford Place
San Ramon, CA 94583

17
18
19
20

Dated: June 9, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2