Association of Irritated Residents v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ATTORNEY'S FEES re 31 Stipulation filed by Lisa Jackson, Jared Blumenfeld, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 4, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)

Download PDF
Association of Irritated Residents v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al Doc. 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division MICHELLE R. LAMBERT Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 Telephone: (202) 616-7501 Fax: (202) 514-8865 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS, an unincorporated association, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:10-CV-03051-WHA STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA JACKSON, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and JARED BLUMENFELD, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator for Region IX of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants. WHEREAS, on July 12, 2010, the Association of Irritated Residents filed the complaint in the above-captioned matter against the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Jared Blumenfeld, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator for Region IX of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (collectively, "EPA"), alleging that EPA has failed to undertake certain nondiscretionary duties under section 304(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a)(2); WHEREAS, Plaintiff's claims in this matter, other than the costs of litigation and Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 reasonable attorneys' fees, were resolved by a Consent Decree entered by the Court on January 12, 2011, see Dkt. 25; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and EPA wish to settle Plaintiff's claims for costs of litigation in this matter, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in order to avoid unnecessary litigation and without any admission of fact or law; NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the entry of an order that: 1. The United States shall pay, within 90 days, $19,000 to the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment by electronic funds transfer in accordance with instructions provided to Defense counsel by Plaintiff''s counsel. 2. Any obligation of the United States to expend funds under this settlement agreement are subject to the availability of appropriations in accordance with the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341. This settlement agreement shall not be construed to require the United States to obligate or pay funds in contravention of said Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341. 3. Payment pursuant to Paragraph 1 within 90 days of the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order (or after 90 days if Plaintiff accepts payment after that date) will constitute full and final payment of costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by Plaintiff in connection with this case prior to the Court's entry of the Consent Decree and in negotiating this Stipulation and Order. Upon payment within 90 days of the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order (or upon payment after 90 days if Plaintiff accepts payment), Plaintiff releases the United States, including EPA, from any claims regarding such fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in connection with this case prior to the Court's entry of the Consent Decree and the preparation and attendance at the Case Management Conference held on January 20, 2011, and in negotiating this Stipulation and Order. The payment pursuant to Paragraph 1 does not affect Plaintiff's right to seek to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees that Plaintiff may incur to enforce the Consent Decree, nor does it affect the right of EPA to oppose any such request for fees and costs, as provided in Paragraph 10 of the Consent Decree. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:10-cv-03051-WHA 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. In the event the United States fails to pay the sum specified in Paragraph 1 within 90 days of the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order, Plaintiff may file a motion with the Court for its costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Such motion shall be filed no later than 150 days after the date the Court enters this Stipulation and Order. The parties agree that, in litigation over such fee application, the United States reserves any defenses it may have to a fee application. Respectfully submitted, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS: Dated: April 1, 2011 /s/ Brent Newell (with permission) BRENT NEWELL (SBN 210312) ALEGRIA DE LA CRUZ (SBN 229713) Center on Race Poverty & the Environment 47 Kearny Street, Suite 804 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 346-4179 Email: bnewell@crpe-ej.org Email: adelacruz@crpe-ej.org Counsel for Plaintiff COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS: Dated: April 1, 2011 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division /s/ Michelle R. Lambert MICHELLE R. LAMBERT Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 Phone: (202) 616-7501 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov Counsel for Defendants PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _________________ April 4, 2011. __________________________________ WILLIAM H. ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:10-cv-03051-WHA 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?