Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 174

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Luxpro Corporation, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS v. Apple, Inc., 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. CV10-03058 JSW 12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. DATES 16 Jury Trial Date: 5/6/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 2 week est. 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 4/15/2013, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 1/18/2013, 9:00 a.m. 19 Last Day for Expert Discovery: 7/16/2012 20 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 8/15/2012 21 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/1/2012 22 Further Case Management Conference: 7/29/2011, 1:30 p.m. 23 Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement due: 7/22/2011 24 B. DISCOVERY 25 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 27 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 28 1 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 2 supplementation has been completed. 3 C. 4 Counsel shall meet and confer and agree upon an ADR process and file a Stipulation re: 5 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ADR process by June 17, 2011. 6 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 7 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 8 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 9 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the 12 date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 13 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 14 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 15 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 16 leave of Court. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: April 25, 2011 19 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?