Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 174

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

Luxpro Corporation,

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

v.
Apple, Inc.,

9

Defendant.

10

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. CV10-03058 JSW

12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.

DATES

16
Jury Trial Date: 5/6/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 2 week est.
17
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 4/15/2013, at 2:00 p.m.
18
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 1/18/2013, 9:00 a.m.
19
Last Day for Expert Discovery: 7/16/2012
20
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 8/15/2012
21
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/1/2012
22
Further Case Management Conference: 7/29/2011, 1:30 p.m.
23
Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement due: 7/22/2011
24
B.

DISCOVERY

25
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
26
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
27
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of
28

1

non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all

2

supplementation has been completed.

3

C.

4

Counsel shall meet and confer and agree upon an ADR process and file a Stipulation re:

5

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

ADR process by June 17, 2011.

6

D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

7

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

8

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

9

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the

12

date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

13

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

14

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

15

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

16

leave of Court.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
Dated: April 25, 2011
19

JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2