Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 60 Stipulation Regarding Motion to Dismiss Briefing. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/20/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2010)

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Doc. 61

Case3:10-cv-03098-JSW Document60

Filed09/17/10 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303

ALDO A. BADINI (SBN 257086) Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Counsel for Defendants PANASONIC CORPORATION PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Defendant SD-3C, LLC SIMON J. FRANKEL Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5356 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Plaintiff SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation, Plaintiff, v. PANASONIC CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, a Delaware corporation; and SD-3C LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 10-3098 JSW

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

Case No. 10-3098 JSW
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-03098-JSW Document60

Filed09/17/10 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303

WHEREAS, pursuant to a joint stipulation between the parties, which was So Ordered by the Court on August 4, 2010, the deadline for Defendants Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, and SD-3C LLC to file motions to dismiss the Complaint in the above-captioned matter is September 24, 2010; WHEREAS counsel for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America, counsel for Defendant SD-3C LLC, and counsel for Plaintiff Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., have conferred regarding the length of briefs in connection with motion to dismiss briefing; WHEREAS counsel for the parties agree that it would be most efficient and convenient for the Court and the parties for (i) Defendants to submit a single joint motion to dismiss the Complaint and consolidated memorandum of points and authorities in support of their joint motion, rather than individual motions and memoranda; (ii) Plaintiff to submit a single opposition to Defendants' joint motion to dismiss; and (iii) Defendants to submit a single consolidated reply to Plaintiff's opposition; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Civil Standing Orders, each Defendant would be permitted to submit a 15 page brief in support of an individual motion to dismiss, for a total of 45 pages, and Plaintiff would be permitted 15 pages in opposition to each individual motion, for a total of 45 pages; WHEREAS counsel for the parties agree that it would be appropriate to preserve the 45 pages in aggregate briefing that the parties would have enjoyed pursuant to the Court's Civil Standing Orders, and, additionally, that Defendants have asserted that the complexity of the issues presented in the Complaint warrant an additional five pages of briefing for Defendants in support of their joint motion to dismiss and an additional five pages of briefing for Plaintiff in opposition, for a total of fifty (50) pages for each brief. The parties further agree that the page limit for Defendants' reply should be twenty-five (25) pages (which is less than the aggregate 45 pages that would be permissible in three separate replies of Defendants under the Court's Civil Standing Orders); 2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING Case No. 10-3098 JSW

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

Case3:10-cv-03098-JSW Document60

Filed09/17/10 Page3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO, through their respective counsel, that: (1) Defendants Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North

America, and SD-3C LLC may submit a consolidated memorandum of points and authorities in 30 support of their joint motion to dismiss the Complaint, which shall not exceed fifty (50) pages of text. Plaintiff Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s, opposition to Defendants' joint 30 motion to dismiss shall not exceed fifty (50) pages of text. (3) Defendants' reply in support of their joint motion to dismiss shall not 20 exceed twenty-five (25) pages of text. (2)

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP By: s/Aldo A. Badini Aldo A. Badini (SBN 257086) Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Counsel for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP By: s/ Christopher B. Hockett Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539) Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862) Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427) 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Defendant SD-3C, LLC Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X.B., the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatory. 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING Case No. 10-3098 JSW

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

Case3:10-cv-03098-JSW Document60

Filed09/17/10 Page4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: s/Simon J. Frankel___________ Simon J. Frankel Evan Robert Cox One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5356 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Derek Ludwin Jonathan Gimblett Monique Mendez O'Donoghue Timothy C. Hester 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Plaintiff Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X.B., the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatory.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED. Dated: September 20 _______________, 2010 ________________________ Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Court

4
Case No. 10-3098 JSW