Wright v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 21

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND STAYING ACTION re 20 Stipulation filed by Todd Wright. Signed by Judge James Larson on 10/19/20. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Case3:10-cv-03115-JL Document20
Wright v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filed10/19/10 Page1 of 2

Doc. 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP
12 Geary Street, Suite 205 San Francisco, CA 94108

Christopher R. LeClerc, Esq. (SB# 233479) LE CLERC & LE CLERC, LLP 12 Geary Street, Ste. 205 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff TODD WRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TODD WRIGHT, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV-10-3115-JL NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT; STIPULATION; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION FOR SIXTY DAYS

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Honorable James Larson

Notice of Conditional Settlement; Stipulation; and [PROPOSED] Order Wright v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al. (N.D. Cal., Case No. CV-10-3115-JL)

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-03115-JL Document20

Filed10/19/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP
12 Geary Street, Suite 205 San Francisco, CA 94108

Whereas, the parties to this action, Plaintiff Todd Wright and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. have reached a settlement in principle; Whereas, the parties are in the process of reducing the agreement to writing; Whereas, the parties wish to maintain the status quo while reducing the settlement to writing; Whereas, the parties do not wish to waste their own or the Court's resources continuing to litigate this action while the settlement in principle is reduced to writing; Whereas, neither party wants to be prejudiced in the event that the settlement in principle is not, for any reason, reduced to a binding written instrument; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties that the Court may enter an Order staying the action in its entirety for a period of sixty calendar days from the date of entry of this Stipulation and Order. In the event that the settlement is not reduced to writing, the parties will jointly request the Court calendar a date for the pending Motion to Dismiss, to which all related deadlines will attach, as well as a case management conference.

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Motion to Dismiss hearing scheduled for November 10, 2010 is VACATED.
DATED: October 18, 2010. LE CLERC & LE CLERC, LLP By /s/ Christopher LeClerc Christopher R. LeClerc Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Wright

DATED: October 18, 2010.

REED SMITH LLP By /s/ Lisa Carvalho Lisa M. Carvalho Renee Feldman Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 DATED: October ____, 2010

____________________________________ Hon. James Larson U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge

1 Notice of Conditional Settlement; Stipulation; and [PROPOSED] Order Wright v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al. (N.D. Cal., Case No. CV-10-3115-JL)