Pinel v. Aurora Loan Services LLC

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND re 5 Stipulation filed by Aurora Loan Services LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/21/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA (CA SBN 154810) [e-mail] WENDY M. GARBERS (CA SBN 213208) [e-mail] RITA F. LIN (CA SBN 236220) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARITZA PINEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

Case No.

10-cv-3118 EMC

15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 10-cv-3118 EMC sf-2872215

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants.

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff Maritza Pinel and defendant Aurora Loan Services LLC ("Aurora"), through their respective counsel, that Aurora shall have until and including August 23, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint. This stipulated extension does not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. Dated: July 20, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By:

/s/ Rita F. Lin Rita F. Lin Attorneys for Defendant AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

Dated: July 20, 2010

ABTAHI LAW FIRM

By:

/s/ Ali Abtahi Ali Abtahi Attorneys for Plaintiff MARITZA PINEL

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C IT IS SO ORDERED: TA
_________________ S SO Edward M. ChenIT I U.S. Magistrate Judge

ED ORDER
rd M. C

R NIA

ER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT C N F Case No. 10-cv-3118 EMC D IS T IC T O sf-2872215 R

A

LI

FO

dwa Judge E

hen

RT U O

/s/ Rita F. Lin Rita F. Lin Attorneys for Defendant AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC.

NO

RT

H

1