Boyd Real Property LLC v. The Mario Juarez Selling Team et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson denying 12 13 Plaintiff's application for temporary restraining order and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to jurisdiction. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2010)

Download PDF
Boyd Real Property LLC v. The Mario Juarez Selling Team et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOYD REAL PROPERTY, LLC, Plaintiff, NO. C10-3142 TEH ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO JURISDICTION THE MARIO JUAREZ SELLING TEAM, et al., Defendants. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 Plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order fails to demonstrate that 13 Plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if this matter cannot be heard on formal notice pursuant 14 to Civil Local Rule 7-2(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining 15 order is DENIED. 16 Although the Court might otherwise construe Plaintiff's papers as a motion for 17 preliminary injunction, it declines to do so in this case because it appears that Plaintiff has 18 failed to advise the Court of all relevant facts. For example, Plaintiff asserts that it received a 19 final judgment for possession of the property in question in Alameda County Superior Court 20 Case No. RG10500488. Mot. at 9. However, it appears that the state court subsequently 21 quashed the writ of possession. Ex. 1 to Defs.' Req. for Judicial Notice. Failure to mention 22 what appears to be a critical fact may violate Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure, but the Court opts not to begin sanctions proceedings at this time. Counsel are 24 hereby put on notice, however, that all subsequent filings with this Court are expected to 25 comply with Rule 11 and all other federal and local rules. 26 If Plaintiff continues to seek preliminary injunctive relief, it shall file a motion for 27 preliminary injunction in accordance with the Civil Local Rules and this Court's standing 28 order. Unless otherwise ordered, the briefing schedule shall follow Civil Local Rule 7-3. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause as to why this Court can 2 and should exercise jurisdiction over a case that appears to have related state court and 3 bankruptcy proceedings pending. Plaintiff's show cause response shall be filed not later than 4 35 calendar days before the re-noticed hearing date on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary 5 injunction, and an opposition and reply regarding jurisdiction may be filed on the same 6 briefing schedule as above. If no motion for preliminary injunction is filed, then the show 7 cause response shall be filed on or before September 27, 2010, with the opposition due by 8 October 12, 2010, and the reply due by October 19, 2010. The matter will then be deemed 9 submitted on the papers unless the Court subsequently orders oral argument. 10 United States District Court 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. For the Northern District of California 12 13 Dated: 09/10/10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?