Hudson v. First Transit, Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 88 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 No. C 10-03158 WHA ADRIENNE HUDSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL FIRST TRANSIT, INC., Defendant. / 18 19 Plaintiff’s counsel move unopposed to dismiss plaintiff’s individual claims with prejudice 20 and to dismiss the proposed class claims without prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 41(a)(2), this order approves the voluntary dismissal of the individual claims of 22 Plaintiff Adrienne Hudson, as well as the voluntary dismissal of plaintiff’s uncertified class 23 claims without prejudice. The unopposed motion to dismiss is thus GRANTED. The hearing set 24 for tomorrow, Thursday, August 18, regarding plaintiff’s motion for class certification is 25 VACATED. The Court notes that plaintiff’s counsel will contact the 31 individuals with whom 26 they have communicated about this action to make sure that they realize the case has been 27 dismissed and the statute of limitations clock will be running as to potential claims by those 28 1 individuals. Other than as to those 31 individuals, notice need not be given to potential class 2 members. 3 The Clerk shall close the file. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 17, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?