Hudson v. First Transit, Inc.
Filing
89
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 88 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
No. C 10-03158 WHA
ADRIENNE HUDSON, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
FIRST TRANSIT, INC.,
Defendant.
/
18
19
Plaintiff’s counsel move unopposed to dismiss plaintiff’s individual claims with prejudice
20
and to dismiss the proposed class claims without prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
21
Procedure 41(a)(2), this order approves the voluntary dismissal of the individual claims of
22
Plaintiff Adrienne Hudson, as well as the voluntary dismissal of plaintiff’s uncertified class
23
claims without prejudice. The unopposed motion to dismiss is thus GRANTED. The hearing set
24
for tomorrow, Thursday, August 18, regarding plaintiff’s motion for class certification is
25
VACATED. The Court notes that plaintiff’s counsel will contact the 31 individuals with whom
26
they have communicated about this action to make sure that they realize the case has been
27
dismissed and the statute of limitations clock will be running as to potential claims by those
28
1
individuals. Other than as to those 31 individuals, notice need not be given to potential class
2
members.
3
The Clerk shall close the file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: August 17, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?