CSWL, Inc. et al v. Higher One, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/21/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

CSWL, Inc. et al v. Higher One, Inc.

Doc. 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert B. Hawk (SBN 118054) J. Christopher Mitchell (SBN 215639) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs CSWL, Inc. and Dan G. Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CSWL, INC., a California corporation, and DAN G. PETERSON, a California resident, Plaintiffs, v. HIGHER ONE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

CASE NO.: 10-cv-3177 SECOND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT The Honorable Bernard Zimmerman

SECOND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: 10-CV-3177
\\\037602/000001 - 56830 v1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS the Summons and Complaint in this Civil Action was served on Defendant on July 22, 2010; WHEREAS, upon the parties' first Joint Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint, the Court extended the deadline for Defendant to file its response to the Complaint from August 12, 2010 to September 27, 2010; WHEREAS, since the date of the Court's granting of the prior extension of time, the parties and counsel have met in person to discuss potential settlement; WHEREAS Plaintiffs' counsel and Defendant's counsel believe that further negotiations may prove productive and that a further extension of thirty (30) days is in the respective parties' best interest to see if there is a possibility of resolving this matter expeditiously and without incurring further costs of litigation; WHEREAS this request for an extension of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, and will not prejudice any party; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and their counsel do not object to this extension; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendant to file its response to the Complaint is extended from September 27, 2010 to October 27, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 21, 2010 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk Attorneys for Plaintiffs CSWL, Inc. and Dan G. Peterson Dated: September 21, 2010 WIGGIN AND DANA LLP By: /s/ James I. Glasser Attorneys for Defendant Higher One, Inc.
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: 10-CV-3177
\\\037602/000001 - 56830 v1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: 10-CV-3177
\\\037602/000001 - 56830 v1

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. September Dated: _________ 21, 2010 _____________________________________ THE HONORABLE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
16873\17\2422040.1

I, Robert B. Hawk, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Second Joint Stipulation Extending Time For Defendants to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that James I. Glasser, Counsel for Defendant, has concurred in this filing.

DATED: September 21, 2010

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By /s/ Robert B. Hawk

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: 10-CV-3177
\\\037602/000001 - 56830 v1