Moore v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER by MDL Panel TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of Ohio. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2010)

Download PDF
By Jakeia R. Mells on Sep 27, 2010 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Sep 10, 2010 IN RE: GADOLINIUM CONTRAST DYES PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 1909 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-49) On February 27, 2008, the Panel transferred 20 civil actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 536 F.Supp.2d 1380 (J.P.M.L. 2008). Since that time, 225 additional actions have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster. Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of February 27, 2008, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 14 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 14-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Sep 27, 2010 ___________________________ Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel I hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Geri M. Smith, Clerk U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio By: s/Renee Schumitsh Deputy Clerk IN RE: GADOLINIUM CONTRAST DYES PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 1909 SCHEDULE CTO-49 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST. DIV. C.A. # CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 10-3181 David Moore, etc. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. CAN 4 10-3180 Karen Smith, etc. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN PAE 2 10-3172 Arline P. Bloom, et al. v. General Electric Co., et al.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?