Flagstar Bank, FSB v. The Loan Experts Corporation et al

Filing 181

ORDER regarding response to administrative motion to seal documents re 165 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Stewart Title of California. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/23/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

Case3:10-cv-03190-CRB Document175 Filed07/16/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
RACHAEL E. MENY, #178514
[e-mail]
JENNIFER A. HUBER, #250143
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for former Plaintiff and non-party
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, a Federally
Chartered Savings Bank,

12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

THE LOAN EXPERTS CORPORATION,
d/b/a ALL AMERICAN FINANCE, a
California corporation; HORMOZ NAZARI,
an individual; ELIZABETH CORTEZ
PADILLA, an individual; 1350 ESCONDIDO
COASTAL, LLC, a California limited liability
company; WESTLAKE COASTAL, LLC, a
California limited liability company; VCHSALINAS 1, LLC, a California limited
liability company; ALLSTAR APPRAISALS,
INC., a California corporation; JAMES MAY,
an individual; and STEWART TITLE OF
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,

Case No. C 10-03190-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
NON-PARTY FLAGSTAR BANK’S
RESPONSE TO CROSS-DEFENDANT
STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA,
INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO
CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(D)
Judge:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Date Comp. Filed:

Michigan: 1/26/2010
USDC/SF: 7/21/2010

21
Defendants.
22
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
Case No. C 10-03190-CRB
678898.01

Case3:10-cv-03190-CRB Document175 Filed07/16/12 Page2 of 2

1

This matter came before the undersigned Judge of the above-captioned Court upon Cross-

2

Defendant Stewart Title’s Administrative Motion to Seal Documents (“Motion to Seal”) and

3

non-party Flagstar Bank, FSB’s (“Flagstar”) Response to the Motion to Seal. Having considered

4

the motion, the response and all other relevant papers concerning that motion and response, it is

5

hereby ORDERED that:

6

•

The Flagstar-produced document which is attached as Exhibit K to the

7

Declaration of Nancy Johnson filed in support of Stewart’s Motion to Seal, titled

8

“Interim Review and Increase Request” and bates labeled FLAG00025647

9

through FLAG00025648, shall be filed under seal;

10

•

The Flagstar-produced documents which are attached as Exhibits G, H, J, L, M,

11

N and O to the Declaration of Nancy Johnson filed in support of Stewart’s

12

Motion to Seal and bates labeled FLAG00010779 through FLAG00010790,

13

FLAG00025581 through FLAG00025611, FLAG00025615 through

14

FLAG00025624, FLAG00025682 through FLAG00025685 shall not be filed

15

under seal; and

16

•

The second document which is attached as Exhibit I to the Declaration of Nancy

17

Johnson filed in support of Stewart’s Motion to Seal, a Flagstar-produced

18

document titled “Warehousing Note 2nd Line” and bates labeled as

19

FLAG00025625 through FLAG00025626, shall not be filed under seal.

20
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2012

RT

28

harle
Judge C

H

E

RN
1
D IS T IC
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS T
R
Case No. C 10-03190-CRB
678898.01

yer

s R. Bre

NO

27

FO

26

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
D
JUDGE, UNITED STATES
RDERE
DISTRICTO O
IS S COURT
IT

LI

25

UNIT
ED

24

RT
U
O

S

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

22

A

21

OF

C