TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 120

ORDER Motion Hearings set for TRACK 2 CASES. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/28/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014)

1

4

Carl L. Blumenstein (CA Bar No. 124158)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5

Defendants’ Liaison Counsel

6

Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

2
3

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Certain Plaintiffs and on Behalf of All Track
2 Plaintiffs

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CASE NO. M:07-md-01827-SI
MDL NO. 1827

17
18
This Document Relates to:
19
20
21

SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corp.,
et al., 3:10-cv-05458-SI
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., 3:11-cv-00829-SI

CASE NOS. 3:10-cv-05458-SI;
3:11-cv-0829-SI; 3:11-cv-02225-SI;
3:11-cv-02495-SI; 3:11-cv-03763-SI;
3:11-cv-03856-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI;
3:11-cv-05765-SI; 3:11-cv-05781-SI;
3:11-cv-06241-SI 3:12-cv-01426-SI;
3:10-cv-05625-SI; 3:10-CV-03205 SI

22
23
24

Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., 3:11-cv-02225-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT SCHEDULE

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp.,
et al., 3:11-cv-02495-SI

25
26
27
28
Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

Interbond Corp. of America v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., 3:11-cv-03763-SI

2
3
4
5
6
7

Schultze Agency Services, LLC, on behalf of
Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC,
v. AU Optronics Corp., et al.,
3:11-cv-03856-SI
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp., et al.
v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., 3:11-cv-04119SI
Tech Data Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp.,
et al., 3:11-cv-05765-SI

8
9
10
11

The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust, by and
through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee
v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., 3:11-cv-05781SI
CompuCom Systems, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., 3:11-cv-06241-SI

12
13
14
15
16

NECO Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., 3:12-cv-01426-SI
Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the Circuit City
Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., 3:10-cv-05625-SI
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., 3:10-cv-03205 SI

17
18
19

Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases, which exclude the State of Oregon case and the

20

Hewlett-Packard case (collectively, “Track 2 Cases”) and Defendants in the Track 2 Cases

21

(collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:

22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS the Parties have met and conferred regarding the Proposed List of Summary
Judgment Motions and Schedule;
WHEREAS the Parties continue to negotiate stipulations that, if executed, would result in
resolving or limiting some of the summary judgment motions listed below;
WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to set a schedule for certain summary judgment
motions; and

28
-1Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1
2

WHEREAS the Parties have also met and conferred regarding a schedule for Daubert
motions;

3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the

4

Parties, and subject to the availability and concurrence of the Court, that the Track 2 cases will

5

adopt the following schedule for summary judgment motions in Track 2:

6

Phase 1

Date

7

Last day to file Phase 1 dispositive motions

March 18, 2014

8

Last day to file oppositions to Phase 1 dispositive motions

April 29, 2014

9

Last day to file reply briefs in support of
Phase 1 dispositive motions

June 10, 2014

10

Hearing on Phase 1 dispositive motions

June 27, 2014

11

Phase 2

12

Last day to file Phase 2 dispositive motions

May 1, 2014

13

Last day to file oppositions to Phase 2 dispositive motions

June 12, 2014

14

Last day to file reply briefs in support of
Phase 2 dispositive motions

July 24, 2014

15

Hearing on Phase 2 dispositive motions

August 8, 2014

16

Phase 3

17

Last day to file Phase 3 dispositive motions

June 2, 2014

18

Last day to file oppositions to Phase 3 dispositive motions

July 14, 2014

19

Last day to file reply briefs in support of
Phase 3 dispositive motions

August 25, 2014

20

Hearing on Phase 3 dispositive motions

September 12, 2014

21
22

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence of the

23

Court, that the following summary judgment topics identified by the Defendants will be in Phase

24

1:

25
26
27
28

1. Certain of Plaintiffs’ state-law claims should be dismissed on choice of law and/or due
process grounds.
2. Plaintiffs seek damages based on purchases of LCD Products containing LCD Panels
that were not manufactured by Defendants or alleged co-conspirators.
-2Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

3. Plaintiffs’ claims and alleged damages relating to “lost sales” are barred because

2

Plaintiffs have failed to provide evidence from which they could establish damages

3

based on “lost sales.”

4

4. Plaintiffs cannot recover from purported conspirators or for claims based on sales by

5

purported conspirators they did not identify in relevant discovery responses and/or

6

which their experts did not analyze.

7

5. Plaintiffs lack antitrust standing under Associated General Contractors.

8

6. AASI is barred from seeking damages for purchases for which it cannot prove that it

9
10
11

paid.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence of the
Court, that the following summary judgment topics identified by Defendants will be in Phase 2:

12

1. Certain of Plaintiffs’ state-law claims should be dismissed because the plaintiffs do

13

not satisfy one or more elements of the claim or are not entitled to any available

14

remedy.

15

2. Plaintiffs cannot recover for claims for purchases of STN-LCD panels.

16

3. Plaintiffs' claims against certain Defendants are barred because those Defendants did

17

not participate in a price-fixing conspiracy with respect to small, medium and/or large

18

panels.

19
20

4. Certain plaintiffs have failed to bring certain claims within the applicable limitations
period.

21

5. TracFone cannot recover for damages exceeding the amount of any overcharge.

22

6. TracFone’s purchases from LG Electronics should be dismissed.

23

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence of the

24

Court, that the following summary judgment topics identified by Defendants will be in Phase 3:

25

1. Certain of Plaintiffs’ alleged damages are barred because they successfully passed

26

through to their customers any alleged overcharge on purchases of LCD Products.

27

2. Certain alleged co-conspirators did not participate in the price-fixing conspiracy

28

plaintiffs allege and purchases from these entities cannot be included in plaintiffs’
-3Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

damages. Defendants will not raise this motion as to Fujitsu.

2

3. Plaintiffs cannot prove that Toshiba participated in the alleged price-fixing conspiracy

3

or can be held liable for the acts of others, or plaintiffs cannot prove that certain

4

defendants participated in the alleged “crystal conspiracy” or in any “overarching” or

5

multilateral conspiracy comparable to the “crystal conspiracy.”

6

4. Certain plaintiffs’ federal claims are barred because they lack standing pursuant to

7

Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977). This motion is limited to arguments

8

that (1) SB Trust, MARTA, AASI and NECO do not have standing to bring Sherman

9

Act I Clayton Act claims under Illinois Brick, and (2) plaintiffs cannot prove

10

ownership and control over certain entities.

11

5. All of Plaintiffs' claims against the Toshiba entities should be dismissed because they

12

are precluded by the judgment in Best Buy Co., Inc. v. Toshiba Corp., Case No. 12-cv-

13

4114.

14
15

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence of the
Court, that the following summary judgment topics identified by Plaintiffs will be in Phase 3:

16

1. Certain Defendants participated in and/or are liable for the alleged conspiracy.

17

2. Certain of Plaintiffs’ alleged damages are allowable because Plaintiffs purchased LCD

18

Products from certain alleged affiliates of Defendants and co-conspirators, and such

19

alleged affiliates are owned or controlled by a Defendant or co-conspirator.

20

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties that the Parties will conclude

21

negotiations regarding and file stipulations regarding resolution or narrowing of any of the above

22

summary judgment motions no later than February 18, 2014;

23

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence and

24

availability of the Court, that the following schedule will apply to any Daubert motions filed by

25

Defendants as to Plaintiffs’ experts Dr. Bernheim, Dr. Marx, Dr. Fontecchio, and Mr. Stowell:

26
27
28
-4Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1
2
3
4
5

Last day to hold depositions of Dr. Bernheim, Dr. Marx, Dr.
Fontecchio, and Mr. Stowell

May 5, 2014

Last day to file Daubert motions

May 29, 2014

Last day to file oppositions to Daubert motions

July 10, 2014

Last day to file reply briefs in support of
Daubert motions

August 21, 2014

Hearing on Daubert motions

September 5, 2014

6
7

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED among the Parties, and subject to the concurrence and

8

availability of the Court, that the following schedule will apply to any Daubert motion as to any

9

Track 2 expert except for Dr. Bernheim, Dr. Marx, Dr. Fontecchio, and Mr. Stowell:

10

Last day to file Daubert motions

11

Last day to file oppositions to Daubert motions

September 9, 2014

12

Last day to file reply briefs in support of
Daubert motions
Hearing on Daubert motions

October 21, 2014
November 7, 2014

13

July 29, 2014

14

Notwithstanding the schedule above, the Parties agree that any Daubert motion that

15

regards any expert appearing only in a single case that will be remanded to a transferor court for

16

trial purposes will be heard by that transferor court.

17
18

Dated: January 28, 2014
Respectfully submitted,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-5Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ Jerome A. Murphy
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Janet I. Levine (CA Bar No. 94255)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jaco Electronics, Inc. and
Rockwell Automation, Inc., and Plaintiffs’ Liaison
Counsel

19
20
By:

21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Philip J. Iovieno
William Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
Melissa Felder (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

26
27
28
-6Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice)
Luke Nikas (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.;
Office Depot, Inc.; Interbond Corp. of America;
Schultze Agency Services, LLC; P.C. Richard & Son
Long Island Corporation; MARTA Cooperative of
America, Inc.; ABC Appliance Inc.; Tech Data Corp.
and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.; The AASI
Creditor Liquidating Trust; CompuCom Systems, Inc.;
and NECO Alliance LLC

9
10
11
12
13
By:
14
15
16
17
18
19

/s/ Robert W. Turken
Robert W. Turken
Mitchell E. Widon
Scott N. Wagner
BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD
LLP
1450 Rickell Avenue, Suite 2300
Miami, FL 33131-3456
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Tech Data Corp. and Tech
Data Product Management, Inc. and The AASI
Creditor Liquidating Trust

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-7Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ H. Lee Godfrey
H. Lee Godfrey
Kenneth S. Marks
Jonathan J. Ross
Johnny W. Carter
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
Parker C. Folse III
Rachel S. Black
Jordan Connors
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of
the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-8Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5

/s/ Marc M. Seltzer
Marc M. Seltzer (54534)
Steven G. Sklaver (237612)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
Erica W. Harris
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002-5096
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for SB Liquidation Trust
11
12
By:

20

/s/ James B. Baldinger
James B. Baldinger
Florida Bar No.: 869899
[e-mail]
Robert L. Ciotti
Florida Bar No.: 333141
[e-mail]
David B. Esau
Florida Bar No.: 650331
[e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.
CityPlace Tower – Suite 1200
525 Okeechobee Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

21

Counsel for TracFone Wireless, Inc.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-9Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Lee F. Berger
Holly A. House (State Bar No. 136045)
Kevin C. McCann (State Bar No. 120874)
Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
Sean Unger (State Bar No. 231694)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Brad D. Brian (State Bar No. 079001)
Jerome C. Roth (State Bar No. 159483)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.

14
15
By:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

/s/ Stephen P. Freccero
Melvin R. Goldman (SBN 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (SBN 131093)
Derek F. Foran (SBN 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices
Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
-10Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ Carl L. Blumenstein
Carl L. Blumenstein (State Bar No. 124158)
Christopher A. Nedeau (State Bar No. 81297)
Farschad Farzan (State Bar No. 215194)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: ( 415) 398-2438
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation
and AU Optronics Corporation America

8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

/s/ Christopher M. Curran
Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice)
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile
Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-11Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4

/s/ Neal A. Potischman
Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862)
[e-mail]
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
Counsel for Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation
(n/k/a Innolux Corporation), CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,
and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. for the Office
Depot, Inc., Interbond Corp. of America, Schultze
Agency Services, LLC, P.C. Richard & Son Long
Island Corp., et al., Tech Data Corp., et al., The AASI
Creditor Liquidating Trust, CompuCom Systems, Inc.,
and NECO Alliance LLC Actions Only

6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Michael R. Scott
Michael R. Scott (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael J. Ewart (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON P.S.
1221 Second Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98101-2925
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation
(n/k/a Innolux Corporation), CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,
and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. for the
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. Action Only

17
18
19

By:

20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ William S. Farmer
William S. Farmer (SBN 46694)
David C. Brownstein (SBN 141929)
Jacob P. Alpren (SBN 235713)
Farmer Brownstein Jaeger LLP
235 Pine Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. in the
MetroPCS Wireless Action Only

26
27
28
-12Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4
5

/s/ Rachel S. Brass
Rachel S. Brass (SBN 219301)
Joel S. Sanders (SBN 107234)
Austin V. Schwing (SBN 211696
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
Attorneys for Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes,
Ltd. in the Office Depot, Jaco Electronics, TracFone,
Interbond, Schultze Agency Services, PC Richard,
Tech Data, AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust, and
CompuCom Actions Only

7
8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV____________
James G. Kreissman (SBN 206740)
Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822)
Jason M. Bussey (SBN 227185)
Elizabeth A. Gillen (SBN 260667)
Melissa D. Schmidt (SBN 266487)
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover St.
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display
Corporation

19
20

By:

21
22
23
24
25
26

/s/ Jacob R. Sorensen
Jacob R. Sorensen (SBN 209134)
John M. Grenfell (SBN 88500)
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
Andrew D. Lanphere (SBN 191479)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

27
28
-13Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

By:

2
3
4

/s/ Michael W. Scarborough
Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
Attorneys for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

6
7
By:

8
9
10
11
12

/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger (Bar No. 95987)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display Inc.) and Hitachi
Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

13
14
By:

15
16
17
18
19
20

/s/ Stephen Holbrook Sutro
George Dominic Niespolo
Stephen Holbrook Sutro
DUANE MORRIS LLP
One Market , Spear Tower, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for NEC Corporation, NEC LCD
Technologies, Ltd., and Renesas Electronics America,
Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-14Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE

1

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this

2

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated:

1/28/14

Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

7
8
9

LEGAL_US_W # 77542011

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-15Case No. M:07-md-01827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHEDULE