TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 23

ORDER re: service and scheduling (10-2305) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)

TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Doc. 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097) [e-mail] STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SBN 131093) [e-mail] DEREK F. FORAN (CA SBN 224569) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION

DAVID LAWRENCE MEYER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP [e-mail] 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 6000 Washington, DC 20006-1888 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 202.887.0763

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-03205-SI

Master File No. M:07-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-03205-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

TracFone Wireless, Inc., Plaintiff, v. AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd,; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; HannStar Display Corporation; LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Defendants.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WHEREAS on July 28, 2010, the Court entered a stipulated order waiving service of the 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 within which the Chunghwa must move against, answer or otherwise respond to TracFone's 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Complaint an additional two weeks; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, TracFone, on the one hand, and defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

WHEREAS plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Inc. ("TracFone") filed the above captioned lawsuit on May 4, 2010 in United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; WHEREAS TracFone filed a Notice of Tag-Along Action to In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation, Case No. M:07-CV-1827-SI, MDL No. 1827, on May 20, 2010; WHEREAS on June 22, 2010, the case was transferred to the Northern District of California, and assigned to the Honorable Susan Illston;

Complaint for certain Defendants and extending the time within which the Defendants must move against, answer or otherwise respond to TracFone's Complaint to September 17, 2010, or until 45 days from the date that TracFone amended its Complaint, whichever was later (see Dkt. No. 1929); WHEREAS on November 9, 2010, the Court entered a stipulation permitting email service of the Complaint for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. ("Chunghwa") and extending the time

Complaint to 45 days from the date that TracFone amended its Complaint (see Dkt. No. 2126); WHEREAS TracFone served Defendants with an Amended Complaint on November 10, 2010, making Defendants' deadline for moving against, answering, or otherwise responding to TracFone's Amended Complaint December 27, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time within which the Defendants must move against, answer or otherwise respond to TracFone's

2

1 2 3 4

Corporation Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; HannStar Display Corporation; LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America Inc.; Sharp

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") on the other hand, as follows: 1. Defendants will have until January 7, 2011, to move against, answer or otherwise respond to TracFone's Amended Complaint. 2. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any challenge to personal jurisdiction by any Defendant.

IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: November 19, 2010

By:

/s/ David B. Esau

David B. Esau James B. Baldinger Robert L. Ciotti David B. Esau Carlton Fields, P.A. 525 Okeechobee Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [phone] [phone] (Fax) Counsel for TracFone Wireless, Inc.

3

1 By: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

/s/ Stephen P. Freccero

Melvin Goldman (CA SB NO. 34097) Stephen P. Freccero (CA SB NO. 131093) Derek F. Foran (CA SB NO. 224569) [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 [phone] [phone] (Fax) Counsel for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation By: /s/ Steven F. Cherry

Steven F. Cherry Gordon Pearson [e-mail] [e-mail] Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-3642 Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc., Nexgen Mediatech Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc. By: /s/ Bruce H. Jackson

Bruce H. Jackson [e-mail] Baker & McKenzie LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Counsel for Defendant Tatung Company of America, Inc.

4

1 By: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

/s/ Hugh F. Bangasser

Hugh F. Bangasser Ramona M. Emerson [e-mail] [e-mail] K& L Gates LLP 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, WA 98104-1158 Jeffrey L. Bornstein [e-mail] K&L Gates LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Counsel for Defendant Hannstar Display Corporation By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz

Michael R. Lazerwitz [e-mail] Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd and LG Display America, Inc. By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen

Jacob R. Sorensen John Grenfell [e-mail] [e-mail] Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 50 Fremont Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation

5

1 By: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

/s/ John H. Chung

Kristen McAhren John H. Chung [e-mail] [e-mail] White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass

Joel S. Sanders, SBN 107234, Rachel S. Brass, SBN 219301, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Counsel for Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. By: /s/ Carl L. Blumenstein

Carl L. Blumenstein Christopher A. Nedeau Nossaman LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Counsel for Defendant AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.

6

1 2 3 4

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. M: 07-1827

Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge

7