Sanchez v. Andruss et al

Filing 52

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE, REPLY. The hearing on the motion for summary judgment is continued from March 15, 2013 to April 26, 2013. The response is due April 6, 2013; the reply is due April 12, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 19, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2013)

Download PDF
4 Jeff Dominic Price, Esq. Attorney at Law SBN 165534 1512 16th Street, Suite 2 Santa Monica, California 90404 jeff.price@mac.com Tel. 310.463.6210 Fax 310.728.1705 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO CESAR SANCHEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DALLAS ANDRUSS et al., No. CV-10-03213-MMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE, REPLY Defendants. The parties, through their counsel of record, have met and conferred. In the interests of justice and judicial economy the parties have stipulated that the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment should be continued to April 26, 2013, that the response to the Motion for Summary Judgment should be due April 5, 2013, and that the Reply should be due April 12, 2013. The parties stipulate to this schedule because the plaintiff did not receive the motion papers until on or after February 5, 2013. In addition, counsel for plaintiff needs substantial time to transmit declarations back and forth to his client in time to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Also, counsel for plaintiff is seeking permission to depose defendant Andruss in a separate filing, and counsel for plaintiff may need to request permission to conduct a deposition or depositions in order to defend against the summary judgment motion. Additionally, there is a distinct possibility that the parties can agree to narrow down the issues presented in the Motion for 28 1 - STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 1 Summary Judgment if additional time is afforded counsel for plaintiff to review the 2 motion and discuss it with the plaintiff. Thus, the parties stipulate to the 3 continuance of the Motion for Summary Judgment hearing date and the filing dates 4 for the response and the reply, in addition to the date for the settlement conference 5 until a time after the issuance of the ruling on the defense summary judgment 6 motion. 7 8 9 Thus, the parties stipulate to the continuance of the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment, now set for March 15, 2013, to April 26, 2013. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 Dated: February 15, 2013 /s/ by Jeff Price by permission Julianne Mossler Deputy Attorney General for Defendants Dated: February 15, 2013 /s/ Jeff Price Jeff Price Attorney for Plaintiff Sanchez 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO General Order 45, § 10(B), counsel for plaintiff hereby attests that Ms. Mossler gave permission to electronically sign this stipulation on her behalf. IT IS SO ORDERED 20 21 22 23 February 19, 2013 Dated: _______________ UNITED STATES JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 24 25 26 27 28 2 - STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?