CTIA - The Wireless Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, California

Filing 113

ORDER RE STIPULATED APPLICATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND DUE DATES FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY re 112 Stipulation, filed by The City and County of San Francisco, California (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
VINCE CHHABRIA, State Bar #208557
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
#1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17

CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION®,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.

18
19

Case No. C10-03224 WHA
STIPULATED APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S
FEES AND DUE DATES FOR OPPOSITION
AND REPLY PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 7-7(a)
AND CIV. L.R. 7-7(d); [PROPOSED] ORDER
Date:
Time:
Before:

December 15, 2011
8:00 a.m.
Judge William H. Alsup
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

20
Date Action Filed:
Trial Date:

21

July 23, 2010
None set

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP TO CONTINUE MOT FOR ATT FEES;
CASE NO. C10-03224 WHA

n:\govlit\li2011\110121\00739201.doc

STIPULATED APPLICATION

1
2

Plaintiff CTIA's Motion for Attorney's Fees in the above-captioned action is set for December

3

15, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. The City's response to this Motion is presently due November 28, 2011.

4

Undersigned counsel for the City will be unable to attend adquately to the response by that date, both

5

because of the time involved in responding to CTIA's emergency request for a stay pending appeal in

6

the Ninth Circuit, and because of pre-arranged vacation plans over the Thanksgiving holiday

7

thereafter. Because a response to CTIA's fee motion requires familiarity with the details of the

8

litigation, and because undersigned counsel for the City is the only attorney for the City familiar with

9

these details, finding substitute counsel to respond to CTIA's motion is not practical. Accordingly, the

10

parties have met and conferred and, subject to this Court approval, have agreed that the hearing on

11

CTIA's motion should be continued to January 5, 2012 at 8:00 a.m., with the City's opposition being

12

due on December 13, 2011 and with CTIA's reply being due on December 22, 2011.

13
14

Dated: November 18, 2011

15
16

By: s/Vince Chhabria
VINCE CHHABRIA

17

Attorney for Defendant
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

Dated: November 18, 2011

21
22

By: **s/Craig E. Stewart
CRAIG E. STEWART

23

Attorney for Plaintiff
CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

24
25

**pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has
obtained approval from this signatory.

26
27
28
STIP TO CONTINUE MOT FOR ATT FEES;
CASE NO. C10-03224 WHA

1

n:\govlit\li2011\110121\00739201.doc

ORDER

1
2

The parties' request to continue Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is GRANTED. The

3

hearing on Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees shall take place on January 5, 2012 at 8:00 a.m.

4

Defendant's opposition to this motion shall be filed no later than December 13, 2011, and Plaintiff's

5

reply shall be filed no later than December 22, 2011.

6
7

Dated: __________________
November 21, 2011.
William Alsup
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP TO CONTINUE MOT FOR ATT FEES;
CASE NO. C10-03224 WHA

2

n:\govlit\li2011\110121\00739201.doc