CTIA - The Wireless Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, California

Filing 86

NOTICE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 10-03224 WHA Plaintiff, v. NOTICE THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 15 / 16 17 18 19 By NOON ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2011, please answer the following questions in five pages or less: (1) Have any compelled disclosures by any government in the United States ever 20 previously been based on a WHO “possible” listing and the “precautionary 21 principle”? If so, was it tested in the caselaw, and if so, provide the cite. 22 (2) What specific studies or evidence led to WHO to list RF energy as a “possible”? 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 24, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?