CTIA - The Wireless Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, California
Filing
86
NOTICE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 10-03224 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.
15
/
16
17
18
19
By NOON ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2011, please answer the following questions in five
pages or less:
(1)
Have any compelled disclosures by any government in the United States ever
20
previously been based on a WHO “possible” listing and the “precautionary
21
principle”? If so, was it tested in the caselaw, and if so, provide the cite.
22
(2)
What specific studies or evidence led to WHO to list RF energy as a “possible”?
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 24, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?