CTIA - The Wireless Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, California

Filing 91

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [re 72 Exhibits, filed by The City and County of San Francisco, California, 71 Request for Judicial Notice, filed by The City and County of San Francisco, California, 70 Request for Judicial Notice, filed by The City and County of San Francisco, California, 73 Exhibits, filed by The City and County of San Francisco, California]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/26/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

No. C 10-03224 WHA

v.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA,

ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S REQUESTS
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Defendant.
/

16
17

Defendant’s request for judicial notice and supplemental request for judicial notice in

18

docket numbers 70–73 are GRANTED to this limited extent. All of the items will be received in

19

evidence as proof of the words used on occasions indicated, but not for the truth of the words.

20

The items would be hearsay if used for that purpose. Exhibit Q attached to defendant’s

21

supplemental request for judicial notice is written in French without an English translation, so it

22

will not be received. Defendant’s further request for judicial notice on October 25 was untimely

23

and outside the invitation to submit five-page memoranda on limited topics, and the new request

24

for judicial notice will not be allowed.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: October 26, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE