Baltazar et al v. Apple Inc

Filing 83

ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 16, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 JACOB BALTAZAR, CLAUDIA KELLER, JOHN R. BROWNING, MATTHEW HALPER, JUDI RITCHIE, CHADWICK HORN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. / 14 15 No. C 10-03231 WHA A series of large-scale criminal trials are underway before the undersigned judge. 16 Because these trials consume an unusual amount of time and resources, motions in civil cases will 17 be considered and heard only on a selective basis. Except for discovery disputes, no motions may 18 be filed in this action without prior written approval. A party seeking approval to file a motion 19 must file a précis that summarizes the essence of the motion and explains its urgency. Any party 20 opposing approval to file based on the précis may file an opposition by noon on the second 21 business day following the day on which the précis was filed. Both the précis and the opposition 22 must be three double-spaced pages or shorter and may not contain footnotes or attachments. 23 After considering the précis and the opposition (if any), the Court will either grant or deny leave 24 to file the motion. If leave is granted, a briefing schedule and hearing date will be set. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: November 16, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?