SkyRiver Technology Solutions, LLC et al v. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.

Filing 24

Request for Judicial Notice re 20 Memorandum in Opposition, filed byInnovative Interfaces, Inc., SkyRiver Technology Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits A-C)(Related document(s) 20 ) (Shartsis, Mary) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ARTHUR J. SHARTSIS (Bar #51549) ashartsis@sflaw.com MARY JO SHARTSIS (Bar #55194) mjshartsis@sflaw.com ROBERT E. SCHABERG (Bar #81430) rschaberg@sflaw.com SIMONE M. KATZ-O'NEILL (Bar #246490) skatz@sflaw.com One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-6500 Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SKYRIVER TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC and INNOVATIVE INTERFACES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 10-03305 JSW SKYRIVER TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company, and INNOVATIVE INTERFACES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiffs, v. OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER, INC., an Ohio corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 10-03305 JSW PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Date: Time: Judge: Crtrm: October 29, 2010 9:00 a.m. Hon. Jeffrey S. White 11, 19th Floor July 28, 2010 None Complaint Filed: Trial Date: PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 Pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Plaintiffs SkyRiver Technology Solutions, LLC and Innovative Interfaces, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") request that the Court take judicial notice of the following documents, true and correct copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively. Exhibit A "Academic Libraries: 2008 First Look," published by the National Center for Education Statistics ("NCES") printed from the NCES website at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010348/tables/table_a3.asp "U.S. District Court--Judicial Caseload Profile" for the Northern District of California for the 12-month period ending September 30 of each year beginning in 2004 and ending in 2009 generated from http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/FederalCourtManagementStatistics.aspx "U.S. District Court--Judicial Caseload Profile" for the Southern District of Ohio for the 12-month period ending September 30 of each year beginning in 2004 and ending in 2009 generated from http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/FederalCourtManagementStatistics.aspx Exhibit B Exhibit C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 10-03305 JSW 5556\005\1674539.1 Judicial notice of each of these documents is proper under Rule 201(b)(2), which provides that a court may take judicial notice of an adjudicative fact "not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is . . . capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." The Judicial Caseload Profiles attached as Exhibits B and C include the annual summary of data relating to the number of filings based on the nature of the case ("K" referring to antitrust cases) each year for 2004-2009. The cover pages for the years 2004-2008 have been omitted since they duplicate information on the 2004-2009 Profiles or cover earlier periods. DATED: September 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted, SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP By: /s/ Mary Jo Shartsis MARY JO SHARTSIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs SKYRIVER TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC and INNOVATIVE INTERFACES, INC. -1PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?