Jardine v. Maryland Casualty Company

Filing 49

ORDER (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES JARDINE, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 JAMES JARDINE, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY, 17 18 Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Nos. 10-3318 SC, 10-3319 SC Related Cases: 10-3335 SC, 10-3336 SC ORDER RE: MARYLAND'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment 20 21 ("Motions") brought by Defendant Maryland Casualty Insurance 22 Company in Case Numbers 10-3318 ("10-3318") and 10-3319 ("10- 23 3319"). 24 Motions, Plaintiff James Jardine ("Jardine") filed two Opposition 25 Briefs. 26 Oppositions, Jardine's attorney, Ronald G. Peck, filed three 27 Declarations. ECF Nos. 35, 36 ("Motions").1 In response to these ECF No. 39, 41 ("Oppositions"). In support of the ECF Nos. 40-1, 42-1, 45 ("Peck Declarations"). 28 1 All ECF numbers refer to filings in the docket for 10-3318. The 1 Peck Declarations refer to multiple exhibits, none of which have 2 been submitted to the Court. 3 re-submit the Peck Declarations to the Court along with the 4 appropriate exhibits. Jardine's counsel shall immediately Chambers copies need not be provided. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: September 28, 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?