Jardine v. Maryland Casualty Company
Filing
49
ORDER (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JAMES JARDINE,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY,
11
Defendant.
12
13
JAMES JARDINE,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY,
17
18
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Nos. 10-3318 SC,
10-3319 SC
Related Cases: 10-3335 SC,
10-3336 SC
ORDER RE: MARYLAND'S
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment
20
21
("Motions") brought by Defendant Maryland Casualty Insurance
22
Company in Case Numbers 10-3318 ("10-3318") and 10-3319 ("10-
23
3319").
24
Motions, Plaintiff James Jardine ("Jardine") filed two Opposition
25
Briefs.
26
Oppositions, Jardine's attorney, Ronald G. Peck, filed three
27
Declarations.
ECF Nos. 35, 36 ("Motions").1
In response to these
ECF No. 39, 41 ("Oppositions").
In support of the
ECF Nos. 40-1, 42-1, 45 ("Peck Declarations").
28
1
All ECF numbers refer to filings in the docket for 10-3318.
The
1
Peck Declarations refer to multiple exhibits, none of which have
2
been submitted to the Court.
3
re-submit the Peck Declarations to the Court along with the
4
appropriate exhibits.
Jardine's counsel shall immediately
Chambers copies need not be provided.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: September 28, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?