Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Filing 118

ORDER RE 117 GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/25/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 BRIAN D. HENRI (State Bar No. 200205) bhenri@twtlaw.com 2 MATTHEW W. MESKELL (State Bar No. 208263) mmeskell@twtlaw.com 3 W. PAUL SCHUCK (State Bar No. 203717) pschuck@twtlaw.com 4 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350 5 San Francisco, California 94111-4037 Telephone: (415) 820-0400 (415) 820-0405 6 Facsimile: 7 JOSEPH E. THOMAS (State Bar No. 101443) jthomas@twtlaw.com 8 MICHAEL I. KATZ (State Bar No. 181728) mkatz@twtlaw.com 9 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230 10 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 679-6400 (949) 679-6405 11 Facsimile: 12 AUSTIN TIGHE (admitted pro hac vice) austin@feazell-tighe.com 13 FEAZELL & TIGHE LLP 6618 Sitio Del Rio Boulevard 14 Building C-101 Austin, Texas 78730 (512) 372-8100 15 Telephone: Facsimile: (512) 372-8140 16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 MICHAEL E. DAVIS, aka TONY DAVIS, VINCE FERRAGAMO, and BILLY JOE 22 DUPREE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 23 Plaintiffs, 24 vs. 25 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., 26 Defendant. 27 CASE No. 10-cv-3328 RS (DMR) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL Case No. CV-10-3328 RS (DMR) 1 The Court approves the withdrawal of Matthew W. Meskell as counsel of record and IT IS 2 SO ORDERED. 3 4/25/12 4 DATED: _______________ 5 6 ____________________________________________ THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL Case No. CV-10-3328 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?