Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Filing
118
ORDER RE 117 GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/25/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)
1 BRIAN D. HENRI (State Bar No. 200205)
bhenri@twtlaw.com
2 MATTHEW W. MESKELL (State Bar No. 208263)
mmeskell@twtlaw.com
3 W. PAUL SCHUCK (State Bar No. 203717)
pschuck@twtlaw.com
4 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350
5 San Francisco, California 94111-4037
Telephone:
(415) 820-0400
(415) 820-0405
6 Facsimile:
7 JOSEPH E. THOMAS (State Bar No. 101443)
jthomas@twtlaw.com
8 MICHAEL I. KATZ (State Bar No. 181728)
mkatz@twtlaw.com
9 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230
10 Irvine, California 92612
Telephone:
(949) 679-6400
(949) 679-6405
11 Facsimile:
12 AUSTIN TIGHE (admitted pro hac vice)
austin@feazell-tighe.com
13 FEAZELL & TIGHE LLP
6618 Sitio Del Rio Boulevard
14 Building C-101
Austin, Texas 78730
(512) 372-8100
15 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(512) 372-8140
16
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21 MICHAEL E. DAVIS, aka TONY DAVIS,
VINCE FERRAGAMO, and BILLY JOE
22 DUPREE, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
vs.
25
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
26
Defendant.
27
CASE No. 10-cv-3328 RS (DMR)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W.
MESKELL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL
Case No. CV-10-3328 RS (DMR)
1
The Court approves the withdrawal of Matthew W. Meskell as counsel of record and IT IS
2 SO ORDERED.
3
4/25/12
4 DATED: _______________
5
6
____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF MATTHEW W. MESKELL
Case No. CV-10-3328 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?