Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Filing
171
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 170 CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE. Motion Hearing set for 9/22/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/11/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BRIAN D. HENRI (State Bar No. 200205)
brianhenri@henrilg.com
HENRI LAW GROUP
640 W. California Ave, Suite 210
Sunnyvale, California 94806
Telephone:
(650) 614-5807
Facsimile:
(650) 618-1937
AUSTIN TIGHE (admitted pro hac vice)
austin@feazell-tighe.com
FEAZELL & TIGHE LLP
6618 Sitio Del Rio Boulevard
Building C-101
Austin, Texas 78730
Telephone:
(512) 372-8100
Facsimile:
(512) 372-8140
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
rvannest@kvn.com
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - #192813
rslaughter@kvn.com
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780
alauridsen@kvn.com
NICHOLAS D. MARAIS - #277846
nmarais@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
MICHAEL E. DAVIS, aka TONY DAVIS,
VINCE FERRAGAMO, and BILLY JOE
DUPREE, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
16
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 10-CV-3328-RS (DMR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING CLASS
CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND HEARING DATE
17
v.
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
18
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
Date Filed: July 29, 2010
19
Defendant.
Trial Date: None set
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
Case No. 10-CV-3328-RS (DMR)
1046925
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed to, and this Court previously entered, a class
certification briefing schedule and hearing date, Dkts. 155–56;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs subsequently requested a continuance of that schedule, see, e.g.,
Dkt. 167;
WHEREAS, the Court vacated the original schedule and ordered the parties to “meet and
6
confer and jointly submit a proposed new briefing schedule and hearing date that extends the time
7
by approximately 90 days…,” Dkt. 169;
8
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to and propose the following schedule:
9
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification due by
July 5, 2016
10
11
Defendant’s opposition to Motion for Class Certification due by
Aug. 12, 2016
12
Plaintiffs’ reply to Motion for Class Certification, if any, due by
Sept. 2, 2016
13
HEARING
Sept. 22, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
14
15
16
Dated: May 11, 2016
HENRI LAW GROUP
17
By:
18
/s/ Brian D. Henri
BRIAN D. HENRI
19
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
Dated: May 11, 2016
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
22
23
By:
24
25
/s/ Nicholas D. Marais
ROBERT A. VAN NEST
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN
NICHOLAS D. MARAIS
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
Case No. 10-CV-3328-RS (DMR)
1046925
1
2
CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM ALL SIGNATORIES
I, Nicholas D. Marais, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Joint Stipulation Regarding Class Certification Briefing Schedule and Hearing. In compliance
4
with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of each
5
signatory to this document.
6
/s/ Nicholas D. Marais
Nicholas D. Marais
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
Case No. 10-CV-3328-RS (DMR)
1046925
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the foregoing Joint Stipulation Regarding Class Certification Briefing
3
4
5
6
Schedule and Hearing, and good cause appearing,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/11/16
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
Case No. 10-CV-3328-RS (DMR)
1046925
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?