Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Filing
252
ORDER by Judge Seeborg granting in part and denying in part 246 Motion to Continue. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MICHAEL E. DAVIS, et al.,
Case No. 10-cv-03328-RS
Plaintiffs,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
12
13
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
Defendant.
14
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF
AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE
DEADLINES, AND CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
15
16
Contending that defendant has obstructed discovery in certain respects, and asserting a
17
scheduling conflict impacting lead counsel’s availability, plaintiffs move for a 60 day continuance
18
of the discovery cutoff and the deadline for expert disclosures. Plaintiffs have failed to show that
19
a general extension of the cut off is warranted. Defendant does not object to the remaining
20
30(b)(6) deposition or the deposition of Cedric Carty going forward after the cut off. The parties
21
shall promptly meet and confer to schedule those depositions to go forward within the next thirty
22
days. The deadline for motions to compel set out in Civil Local Rule 37-3 shall run from the
23
existing discovery cut off, but shall not apply with respect to any disputes growing out of those
24
depositions or any other discovery responses served after the cut off. The deadline for expert
25
disclosures is hereby extended to August 25, 2017, with a commensurate extension of the deadline
26
for rebuttal reports and the close of expert discovery. In light of the matters under submission and
27
the pending discovery disputes, the further case management conference is continued to
28
September 7, 2017.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: July 14, 2017
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.
2
10-cv-03328-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?