Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Filing 264

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 231 Motion for Leave to Amend. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL E. DAVIS, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03328-RS Plaintiffs, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 12 13 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., Defendant. 14 15 16 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend has been 17 submitted without oral argument. In light of the liberal policy favoring amendment, and given no 18 showing of prejudice or undue delay to an extent that would warrant denial, the motion will be 19 granted. Nothing in this order, however, or in the filing of the amended complaint, shall serve to 20 revive the statutory claims as to which partial summary judgment in favor of defendant has been 21 granted. Nor does this order preclude defendant from moving to dismiss or strike portions of the 22 amended pleading, although it presently appears likely that defendant’s contentions regarding the 23 alleged class definitions could be more efficiently addressed in any renewed motion for class 24 certification, rather than through a motion to strike. Discovery will not be reopened absent a 25 specific and compelling showing, made by noticed motion, that any of the amendments warrant 26 further discovery. 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 Dated: August 4, 2017 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2 10-cv-03328-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?