Davis v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Filing 74

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Defendant may file a supplemental brief by 07/15/2011 and Plaintiffs may file their response by 07/29/2011. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 07/08/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2011)

1

*E-Filed ________*

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

MICHAEL E. DAVIS, aka TONY DAVIS,
VINCE FERRAGAMO, and BILLY JOE
DUPREE, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

12

No. C 10-03328 RS
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
15
16

Defendant.
____________________________________/

17
18

On June 16, 2011, at the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses to discovery,

19

Magistrate Judge Ryu granted in part and denied in part the motion and indicated that her written

20

Order would follow. On June 30, 2011, defendant filed a motion for relief from the non-dispositive

21

pre-trial order. On July 5, 2011, the written Order was issued.

22

Accordingly, by July 15, 2011, defendant may file a supplemental brief, not to exceed 3

23

pages, addressing any additional points that may warrant discussion in light of the Magistrate

24

Judge’s written Order. By July 29, 2011, plaintiffs may file their response to defendant’s

25

objections, not to exceed 8 pages. The matter will thereafter be submitted without oral argument or

26

further briefing unless otherwise ordered.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
NO. C 10-03228 RS
ORDER

6

FO

A

H

ER

LI

RT

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
eeborg
ichard S
Judge R

NO

4

RICHARD SEEBORG

R NIA

S

3

Dated: 07/08/2011

UNIT
ED

2

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

7
8

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 10-03328 RS
ORDER

2