Murray v. Stanford Insurance Company

Filing 19

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING. Standard shall have up to and including November 24, 2010 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 5, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

Download PDF
Murray v. Stanford Insurance Company Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 SHAWN HANSON (SBN109321) shanson@akingump.com MARIA ELLINIKOS (SBN 235528) mellinikos@akingump.com DANIELLE CROCKETT (SBN #261809) dcrockett@akingump.com AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, 15th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1036 Telephone: 415-765-9500 Facsimile: 415-765-9501 Attorneys for Defendant STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) CHRISTOPHER MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 3:10-CV-03368-MMC ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Judge: Maxine M. Chesney Ctrm: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6, Plaintiff Christopher Murray ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. 2. 22, 2010; 3. 4. The Court granted the Motion to Dismiss on October 21, 2010 (Doc. 13); In its Order on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a First Plaintiff initiated this action on July 30, 2010 (Doc. 1); Standard filed its Motion to Dismiss the Third Cause of Action (Doc. 7) on September Amended Complaint by November 10, 2010; 5. Plaintiff intends to file a First Amended Complaint; 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03368-MMC Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. Standard currently must file its Answer to the Complaint (Doc. 1) by November 4, 2010, before the First Amended Complaint is due; and 7. On October 25, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel agreed to extend the time for Standard to respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1) up to and including November 24, 2010. Plaintiff further agreed that if Plaintiff files an amended complaint on or before November 10, 2010, Standard's time to respond to such amended complaint shall be extended up to and including November 24, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that Standard shall have an additional twenty (20) days, up to and including November 24, 2010, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1) in this matter. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 29, 2010 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP ___________________________ /s/ DANIELLE CROCKETT Attorney for Defendant STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY JESSE S. KAPLAN ___________________________ /s/ JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER MURRY PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2010 ___________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03368-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?