MPH Technologies Oy v. Zyxel Communications Corporation et al

Filing 152

ORDER granting (as to "Check Point") re 151 Stipulation Re Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/27/11. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 4/28/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) Email: jbovich@reedsmith.com Doyle B. Johnson (SBN 180348) Email: dbjohnson@reedsmith.com Adaline J. Hilgard (SBN 173213) Email: ahilgard@reedsmith.com REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 Telephone: +1 415 543 8700 Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269 Attorneys for Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., and Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd. 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY, , Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RAYMOND P. NIRO (Member of N.D. Cal. Bar) WILLIAM L. NIRO (pro hac vice) CHRISTOPHER J. LEE (pro hac vice) BRIAN E. HAAN (pro hac vice) ANNA B. FOLGERS (pro hac vice) NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 181 W. Madison St., Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0733 Facsimile: (312) 236-3137 rniro@nshn.com wniro@nshn.com clee@nshn.com bhaan@nshn.com afolgers@nshn.com Counsel for Plaintiff, MPH Technologies OY 14 17 MARTIN L. FINEMAN (CA Bar No. 104413) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAIN LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6575 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 martinfineman@dwt.com No.: 3:10-cv-03376-RS STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., NETGEAR, INC., CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., and CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 27 28 Case No. 3:10-cv-03376-RS STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 Plaintiff MPH Technologies OY (“MPH”), on the one hand, and Defendants Check Point 2 Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (collectively “Check 3 Point”), on the other hand, hereby agree and stipulate through their designated counsel that all claims 4 for relief brought by MPH against Check Point and all counterclaims brought by Checkpoint against 5 MPH are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. 6 MPH and Check Point further agree and stipulate that all claims for relief brought by MPH against 7 the remaining Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. (“NETGEAR”) and all counterclaims brought by 8 NETGEAR against MPH remain in place and are not waived, discharged or compromised by this 9 Stipulation and Proposed Order. REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 DATED: April 27, 2011. 12 REED SMITH LLP 13 14 By /s/ John P. Bovich John P. Bovich* Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. By /s/ Christopher J. Lee Christopher J. Lee Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MPH Technologies OY 15 16 17 18 19 DATED: April 27, 2011. 20 21 22 23 *Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, John P. Bovich hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 24 25 ORDER AND JUDGMENT 26 27 28 Pursuant to Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that all claims for relief brought in this Action by MPH Technologies OY against Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. Case No. 3:10-cv-03376-RS -1STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (collectively “Check Point”) are DISMISSED WITH 2 PREJUDICE and all counterclaims brought in this Action by Check Point against MPH 3 Technologies OY are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, 4 costs and expenses. All claims for relief brought by MPH Technologies OY against the remaining 5 defendant, and all counterclaims brought by the remaining Defendant against MPH Technologies 6 OY remain in place and are not waived, discharged or compromised by entry of this Order. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA By 13 S UNIT ED 12 _ United States District Judge Richard g Seeborg ebor hard Se dge Ric Ju FO ER H 15 LI 14 RT REED SMITH LLP 11 NO A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware April 27 DATED: _________________________, 2011. RT U O 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA 16 A 8 N F D IS T IC T O R 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:10-cv-03376-RS -2STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?