MPH Technologies Oy v. Zyxel Communications Corporation et al

Filing 154

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 153 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/16/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2011)

*E-Filed 5/16/11*
1
2
3
4

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688)
Email: [e-mail]
Doyle B. Johnson (SBN 180348)
Email: [e-mail]
Adaline J. Hilgard (SBN 173213)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

12

RAYMOND P. NIRO (Member of N.D. Cal. Bar)
WILLIAM L. NIRO (pro hac vice)
CHRISTOPHER J. LEE (pro hac vice)
BRIAN E. HAAN (pro hac vice)
ANNA B. FOLGERS (pro hac vice)
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
181 W. Madison St., Suite 4600
Chicago, IL 60602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13

Counsel for Plaintiff, MPH Technologies OY

5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
NETGEAR, Inc.

8
9

REED SMITH LLP

10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

MARTIN L. FINEMAN (CA Bar No. 104413)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAIN LLP 505
Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY,

No.: 3:10-cv-03376-RS
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
NETGEAR INC.,
21
Defendant.
22
23

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

24
25

Plaintiff MPH Technologies OY (“MPH”), on the one hand, and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc.

26

(“NETGEAR”), on the other hand, hereby agree and stipulate through their designated counsel that

27

all claims for relief brought by MPH against NETGEAR and all counterclaims brought by

28

NETGEAR against MPH are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees,
Case No. 3:10-cv-03376-RS

-1STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

costs and expenses.

2
DATED: May 16, 2011.
3
REED SMITH LLP

4
5

By

6
7
8

/s/ John P. Bovich
John P. Bovich
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
NETGEAR, Inc.

DATED: May 16, 2011.

9

NIRO, HALLER & NIRO

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
By

11
12
13
14

/s/ Christopher J. Lee
Christopher J. Lee*
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
MPH Technologies OY

*Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, John P.
Bovich hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

15

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

16
17

Pursuant to Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that all claims for relief

18

brought in this Action by MPH against NETGEAR, Inc. (“NETGEAR”) are DISMISSED WITH

19

PREJUDICE and all counterclaims brought in this Action by NETGEAR against MPH Technologies

20

OY are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs and

21

expenses.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

5/16
DATED: _________________________, 2011.

25
26

By

27

_
United States District Judge Richard Seeborg

28
Case No. 3:10-cv-03376-RS

-2STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE