Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Lindquist
Filing
18
ORDER VACATING Show Cause Hearing. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/22/2010. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Lindquist
Doc. 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, and BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, vs. M.A. LINDQUIST CO., INC., a California corporation Defendant. ) Case No. 10-00812 SC ) ) ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE ) HEARING ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On November 3, 2010, the Court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. ECF No. 24. Since then,
Plaintiffs' counsel has filed a number of declarations explaining her efforts to prosecute this case, and Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Default Judgment, scheduled to be heard on January 7, 2011. ECF No. 29.
Plaintiffs move for Default Judgment based on M.A. Lindquist Co., Inc.'s failure to appoint new counsel, as corporations must be represented in federal court by counsel. Having considered the actions taken by Plaintiffs' counsel, the Court VACATES the show cause hearing scheduled for December 3,
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California
2010.
Within five (5) days of this Order, Plaintiffs must file a
Proof of Service with the Court showing that this Order was served on Defendant M.A. Lindquist Co., Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 22, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?