Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Lindquist

Filing 72

ORDER re 71 Proposed Order Extending Deadline and to Re-Submit Proposed Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/29/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011) Modified on 12/29/2011 (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

George M. Kraw (SBN 71551)
Katherine A. McDonough (CA Bar No. 241426)
Donna L. Kirchner (SBN 138320)
KRAW AND KRAW
605 Ellis Street, Suite 200
Mountain View, CA 94043
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California; and
Board of Trustees, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for
Northern California

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND )
FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
MARK ALAN LINDQUIST,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )

Case No.: C10-3386 SC
MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO SUMBIT
SCHEDULING ORDER FOR DEBTORS
EXAM; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS
MODIFIED

On December 8, 2011, Magistrate Judge Ryu issued an order setting December 16, 2011 as

21

the deadline for Plaintiffs to submit a proposed scheduling order for a judgment debtor examination.

22

On Friday, December 16, 2011, counsel for Plaintiffs attempted to e-file the proposed order, but was

23

unable to access the court’s electronic filing system. Counsel submitted the proposed order via

24

Judge Ryu’s proposed order email address and contacted Judge Ryu’s courtroom deputy to advise

25

the court of the difficulty with efiling. The courtroom deputy advised counsel to electronically file

26

the proposed order when possible. This morning (Monday, December 19, 2011), counsel has

27

successfully accessed the court’s electronic filing system and has e-filed the proposed order for the

28

debtors exam. Based on the foregoing, to the extent submission of the proposed order to the

C10-3386 SC Request to Extend Time

Page 1

1

proposed order email address did not comply with this court’s prior order, Plaintiffs request that the

2

court extend to December 19, 2011 the time for submitting the proposed order and deem the

3

proposed order that Plaintiffs filed today to have been timely filed.

4

Dated:
KRAW & KRAW

5
Donna L. Kirchner, Esq.
Counsel for Plaintiffs

6
7
8
9

[Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE AND TO RE-SUBMIT PROPOSED

10

SCHEDULING ORDER

11

By no later than January 4, 2012, Plaintiffs shall re-submit a proposed scheduling order for a

12

judgment debtor examination that is in accordance with the court’s scheduling of such

13

examinations as described in the court’s December 8, 2011 Order, e.g., during months when the

14

undersigned is not on criminal duty, such examinations shall commence at 9:30 a.m. Further, the

15

proposed scheduling order shall state that the examination will take place at the U.S. District Court,

16

1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. For courtroom number and floor information, please

17

check the Court’s on-line calendar at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars” link on left

18

side, click link to Judge Ryu’s calendar) or call Judge Ryu’s Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510)

19

637-3639, one week prior to the scheduled examination.

NO

_________________________________
Magistrate Judge Donna M. a M. Ryu
Ryu

24

RT

ER

H

25

onn

Judge D

26
27
28

C10-3386 SC Request to Extend Time

Page 2

FO

Dated: December 29, 2011

A

23

LI

22

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

N

R NIA

S
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

21

RT
U
O

20

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C