Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Lindquist

Filing 72

ORDER re 71 Proposed Order Extending Deadline and to Re-Submit Proposed Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/29/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011) Modified on 12/29/2011 (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 George M. Kraw (SBN 71551) Katherine A. McDonough (CA Bar No. 241426) Donna L. Kirchner (SBN 138320) KRAW AND KRAW 605 Ellis Street, Suite 200 Mountain View, CA 94043 Telephone: (650) 314-7800 Facsimile: (650) 314-7899 Counsel for Plaintiffs Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California; and Board of Trustees, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND ) FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MARK ALAN LINDQUIST, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C10-3386 SC MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO SUMBIT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR DEBTORS EXAM; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED On December 8, 2011, Magistrate Judge Ryu issued an order setting December 16, 2011 as 21 the deadline for Plaintiffs to submit a proposed scheduling order for a judgment debtor examination. 22 On Friday, December 16, 2011, counsel for Plaintiffs attempted to e-file the proposed order, but was 23 unable to access the court’s electronic filing system. Counsel submitted the proposed order via 24 Judge Ryu’s proposed order email address and contacted Judge Ryu’s courtroom deputy to advise 25 the court of the difficulty with efiling. The courtroom deputy advised counsel to electronically file 26 the proposed order when possible. This morning (Monday, December 19, 2011), counsel has 27 successfully accessed the court’s electronic filing system and has e-filed the proposed order for the 28 debtors exam. Based on the foregoing, to the extent submission of the proposed order to the C10-3386 SC Request to Extend Time Page 1 1 proposed order email address did not comply with this court’s prior order, Plaintiffs request that the 2 court extend to December 19, 2011 the time for submitting the proposed order and deem the 3 proposed order that Plaintiffs filed today to have been timely filed. 4 Dated: KRAW & KRAW 5 Donna L. Kirchner, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE AND TO RE-SUBMIT PROPOSED 10 SCHEDULING ORDER 11 By no later than January 4, 2012, Plaintiffs shall re-submit a proposed scheduling order for a 12 judgment debtor examination that is in accordance with the court’s scheduling of such 13 examinations as described in the court’s December 8, 2011 Order, e.g., during months when the 14 undersigned is not on criminal duty, such examinations shall commence at 9:30 a.m. Further, the 15 proposed scheduling order shall state that the examination will take place at the U.S. District Court, 16 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. For courtroom number and floor information, please 17 check the Court’s on-line calendar at (click “Calendars” link on left 18 side, click link to Judge Ryu’s calendar) or call Judge Ryu’s Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510) 19 637-3639, one week prior to the scheduled examination. NO _________________________________ Magistrate Judge Donna M. a M. Ryu Ryu 24 RT ER H 25 onn Judge D 26 27 28 C10-3386 SC Request to Extend Time Page 2 FO Dated: December 29, 2011 A 23 LI 22 D RDERE OO IT IS S N R NIA S IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 21 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?