Quatela v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 44 GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/12/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2011)

*E-Filed 8/18/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SEDGWICK LLP
RALPH A. CAMPILLO (CA State Bar No. 070376)
[e-mail]
ARAMEH ZARGHAM (CA State Bar No. 239495)
[e-mail]
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Telephone:
213.426.6900
Facsimile:
213.426.6921
SEDGWICK LLP
WAYNE A. WOLFF (CA State Bar No. 161351)
[e-mail]
DAVID D. MESA (CA State Bar No. 257488)
[e-mail]
One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415.781.2635

11
12

Attorneys for Defendants
STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES
CORPORATION

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
SUE QUATELA,

CASE NO. CV 10 3422 (RS)

17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23

vs.
STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan
corporation; STRYKER SALES
CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation;
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS,
LP, a Delaware limited partnership;
ASTRAZENECA LP, a Delaware limited
partnership; and DOES 1-20, Inclusive,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and L.R. 16-2]

Defendants.

24
25

For good cause shown, Plaintiff SUE QUATELA (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants

27

STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION’s (“Stryker”)

28

stipulated request to modify the scheduling order is granted. The Scheduling Order is modified

USDC CASE NO. CV 10 3422 (RS)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
SF/2307282v1

1
2
3

as follows:
1. Last day for Plaintiff to disclose experts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2):
December 28, 2011;

4

2. Last day for Defendants to disclose experts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2):
January 27, 2012;

5

3. Last day for all parties to disclose rebuttal experts: February 27, 2012;

6

4. Expert discovery cut-off: March 27, 2012; and

7

5. All other Scheduling Order dates shall remain the same.

8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

8/12/11
Dated: _________________

__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28

USDC CASE NO. CV 10 3422 (RS)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
SF/2307282v1