WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Filing
658
ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 657 Stipulation filed by Hewlett Packard Company. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 18, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)
WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Doc. 658
1 DANIEL A. DEVITO (pro hac vice) STACEY L. COHEN (pro hac vice) 2 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Four Times Square 3 New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212)735-3000 4 Facsimile: (212)735-2000/1 Daniel.DeVito@skadden.com 5 Stacey.Cohen@skadden.com 6 RAOUL D. KENNEDY (Bar No. 40892) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 7 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, CA 94111 8 Telephone: (415) 984-6400 Facsimile: (415) 984-2698 9 Raoul.Kennedy@skadden.com 10 DAVID W. HANSEN (Bar No. 196958) ANDREW N. THOMASES (Bar No. 177339) 11 MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS (Bar No. 259692) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 12 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 13 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 14 David.Hansen@skadden.com Andrew.Thomases@skadden.com 15 Michael.Saunders@skadden.com 16 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 WIAV NETWORKS, LLC, ) CASE NO.: 3:10-CV-03448-WHA 21 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 22 ) ORDER REGARDING CLAIM v. ) CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 23 ) SCHEDULE 3COM CORPORATION, et al., ) 24 ) Defendants. ) 25 ) ) 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO.: 3:10-CV-03448-WHA
Dockets.Justia.com
1
WHEREAS Patent Local Rule 4-5 provides that, in a patent case, "the party claiming patent
2 infringement . . . shall serve and file an opening brief" and a "reply brief" and "each opposing party 3 shall serve and file [a] responsive brief," and thus, in a typical single defendant patent case, only a 4 total of three claim construction briefs are to be submitted to the Court under the Patent Local 5 Rules; 6 WHEREAS the parties' "Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction," and the
7 resulting order entered by the Court (Dkt. No. 590), states that "[e]ach party shall submit its 8 Opening Claim Construction Brief," "[e]ach party shall submit its Responsive Claim Construction 9 Brief," and "[e]ach party shall submit its Reply Claim Construction Brief," implying that a total of 10 six claim construction briefs are to be submitted to the Court in this case; 11 WHEREAS to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court by reducing the total
12 number of claim construction briefs submitted; 13 Plaintiff WiAV Networks, LLC and Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company, by their
14 respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the October 18, 2010 "Order Re Schedule 15 for Claim Construction" ("the Order") as follows: 16 1. Paragraph 8 of the Order is stricken and replaced with the following: "Plaintiff
17 WiAV Networks, LLC shall submit its Opening Claim Construction Brief and any supporting 18 evidence by March 23, 2011." 19 2. Paragraph 9 of the Order is stricken and replaced with the following: "Defendant
20 Hewlett-Packard Company shall submit its Responsive Claim Construction brief and supporting 21 evidence by April 5, 2011." 22 3. Paragraph 10 of the Order is stricken and replaced with the following: "Plaintiff
23 WiAV Networks, LLC shall submit its Reply Claim Construction Brief and any rebuttal evidence 24 by April 12, 2011." 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 ///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO.: 3:10-CV-03448-WHA
1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 Dated: March 17, 2010 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 FILER'S ATTESTATION: PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 19 Pursuant to General Order no. 45, Section X(B), Andrew N. Thomases hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 20 21 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 Dated: ______________________, 2010 March 18 23 24 _________________________________ 25 HON. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 26 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO.: 3:10-CV-03448-WHA
LEE, HONG, DEGERMAN, KANG & WAIMEY By: /s/ Mark L. Sutton Mark L. Sutton (SBN 120255) Michael Oleinik (SBN 181163) LEE, HONG, DEGERMAN, KANG & WAIMEY 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 623-2221 Facsimile: (213) 623-2211 msutton@lhlaw.com moleinik@lhlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff WIAV NETWORKS, LLC
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM, LLP By: /s/ Andrew N. Thomases ANDREW N. THOMASES Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?