Dinius v. Perdock et al

Filing 31

ORDER VACATING CMC; ORDER CONTINUING HEARING re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charles F. Slabaugh, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 14 MOTION to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/12/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Download PDF
Dinius v. Perdock et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California BISMARCK F. DINIUS, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-03498 MEJ ORDER VACATING CMC ORDER CONTINUING HEARING RE MOTION TO DISMISS RUSSELL L. PERDOCK, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Case Management Statement, filed November 11, 2010. As Defendant Russell Perdock has yet to retain counsel, Defendant Charles Slabaugh has a pending motion to dismiss, and all other remaining defendants intend to file a joint motion to dismiss, the Court finds a case management conference premature and hereby VACATES the November 18, 2010 Case Management Conference. Further, to allow Mr. Perdock time to retain counsel, and so that any motions to dismiss may be heard at the same time, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing on Mr. Slabaugh's motion to January 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Mr. Perdock and all other defendants shall file their responsive pleadings by December 16, 2010, and notice them for hearing on January 20, 2011. Mr. Slabaugh's motion to appear by telephone is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?