Dinius v. Perdock et al

Filing 93

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 90 Stipulation to file Second Amended Answer. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

THE BIERNAT LAW GROUP
JAMES D. BIERNAT, SBN 95839
LISA L. PAN, SBN 188442
1633 Bayshore Hwy, Suite 133
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
RUSSELL E. PERDOCK

7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BISMARK F. DINIUS,

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case No.: 3:10-cv-03498 ME

Plaintiffs,

12
13

vs.

14

RUSSELL E. PERDOCK, in his Individual
Capacity; RODNEY K. MITCHELL, in his
Individual & Official Capacities; JOHN E.
HOPKINS, in his Individual Capacity;
DENNIS W. OSTINI, in his Individual
Capacity; JAMES BAUMAN, in his
Individual Capacity; LLOYD
WELLS, in his Individual Capacity; JAMES
SAMPLES, in his Individual Capacity; DEAN
A. PICK, in his Individual Capacity;
CHARLES F. SLABAUGH, in his Individual
Capacity; COUNTY OF LAKE, a public
entity; and DOES ONE through TWENTYFIVE, inclusive,
,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
LEAVE TO FILE RUSSELL E.
SECOND AMENDED
ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY
TRIAL

Defendants.

24
25
26

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys

27
28

of record that Defendant Russell E. Perdock may file a Second Amended Answer
DEFENDANT RUSSELL E
COMPLAINT 1

SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED

1
2

Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
7/16/12
Dated: ___________

THE BIERNAT LAW GROUP

3
By:
4

LISA L. PAN
Attorneys for Defendant
RUSSELL E. PERDOCK

5
6
7

7/16/12
Dated: ___________

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE
PROJECT

8
9

By:

10
11

/s/ PER EMAIL AUTHORITY OF COUNSEL
KATHLEEN RIDOLFI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BISMARCK F. DINIUS

12
13

7/16/12
Dated: ___________

14

LAW OFFICE OF LAURENCE O. MASSON
By:

15
16

/s/ PER EMAIL AUTHORITY OF COUNSEL
LAURENCE O. MASSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BISMARCK F. DINIUS

17
18

7/16/12
Dated: ___________

RANDOLPH, CREGGER AND CHALFANT

19
By:

20
21

/s/ PER EMAIL AUTHORITY OF COUNSEL
ROBERT L. CHALFANT
Attorneys for Defendant
CHARLES F. SLABAUGH

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEFENDANT RUSSELL E
COMPLAINT 2

SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED

7/16/12
Dated: ___________

2

PORTER | SCOTT
By:

3
4
5

/s/ PER EMAIL AUTHORITY OF COUNSEL
JOHN R. WHITEFLEET
TERENCE J. CASSIDY
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF LAKE, LAKE COUNTY
RODNEY K. MITCHELL, JON E. HOPKINS,
DENNIS OSTINI, JAMES BAUMAN, LLOYD
WELLS, AND DEAN A. PICK

6
7
8

ORDER

9

cond Amended Answer to

10
11
12

accepted for filing. .Perdock shall separately e-file the amended answer.

13

July 19, 2012
SO ORDERED: (date)______________

_____________________________
S DISTRICT
T Court Judge/Magistrate
District E
C
A

16
17

TED

GRAN

18

ames

-Elena J

aria
Judge M

20
21

A

H

ER

LI

RT

19

FO

15

R NIA

UNIT
ED

T

RT
U
O

S

14

NO

Per

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEFENDANT RUSSELL E
COMPLAINT 3

SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED