State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 126

ORDER RE: STIPULATION #5550; WHEREAS the undersigned AGs that were served with LG Displays Motion to Amend are required to file their Oppositions to that Motion on or before April 27, 2012, and LG Display is required to file its Reply(ies) in support of its Motion on or before May 8, 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned AGs and LG Display, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows: The time for the undersigned AGs to respond to LG Displays Motion to Amend shall be extended to May 14, 2012.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/2/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Holly A. House (SB# 136045)
Kevin C. McCann (SB# 120874)
Sean D. Unger (SB# 231694)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Lee F. Berger (SB# 222756)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display
America, Inc.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CASE NOS. 10-cv-3517 SI; 10-cv-03619 SI
Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI

16

MDL No. 1827

17

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS

18

This Document Relates to Individual Case
Nos:

19
20

State of Florida v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517
SI

Judge: Honorable Susan Y. Illston

21
22

State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03619
SI

23
24
25
26
27
28
Case Nos. 10-cv-3517 SI; 10-cv-3619
Case No. M 07-1827 SI

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE
TO RESPOND TO DEFS MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS

1
2

Defendants LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. (together, “LG Display”)
and the State Attorneys Generals (“AGs”) in the above captioned actions stipulate as follows:

3

WHEREAS, LG Display moved for leave to amend its Answers and to assert Additional

4

Defenses and the LG Display Counterclaims in State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation, et

5

al., Case No. 10-cv-3517 SI, and State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,

6

Case No. 10-cv-03619 SI, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on

7

March 22, 2012 (hereafter, “LG Display’s Motion to Amend”);

8

WHEREAS the undersigned AGs that were served with LG Display’s Motion to Amend

9

are required to file their Oppositions to that Motion on or before April 27, 2012, and LG Display

10
11

is required to file its Reply(ies) in support of its Motion on or before May 8, 2012;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

12

undersigned AGs and LG Display, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, as

13

follows:

14
15

The time for the undersigned AGs to respond to LG Display’s Motion to Amend shall be
extended to May 14, 2012.

16
17

SO STIPULATED:

18

Dated: April 27, 2012

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By:

/s/ Lee F. Berger
Holly A. House
[e-mail]
Kevin C. McCann
[e-mail]
Sean D. Unger
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Lee F. Berger
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26
27
28
Case Nos. 10-cv-3517 SI; 10-cv-3619
Case No. M 07-1827 SI

-1-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE
TO RESPOND TO DEFS MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS

1

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd.
and LG Display America, Inc.

2
3

By:

7

/s/ Nicholas J. Weilhammer
Nicholas J. Weilhammer
[e-mail]
STATE OF FLORIDA
Office of the Attorney General State of Florida
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Florida

4
5
6

9
By:

14

/s/ Anne E. Schneider
Anne E. Schneider
[e-mail]
STATE OF MISSOURI
Assistant Attorneys General
Missouri Attorney General Office
P. O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Missouri

10
11
12
13

16
By:

21

/s/ Kevin Wells
Kevin Wells
[e-mail]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Assistant Attorney General
Arkansas Attorney General Office
323 Center Street, Suite 500
Little Rock, AR 72201
Telphone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

22

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Arkansas

17
18
19
20

23
By:

24
25
26
27
28
Case Nos. 10-cv-3517 SI; 10-cv-3619
Case No. M 07-1827 SI

/s/ Mary Elizabeth Lippitt
Mary Elizabeth Lippitt
[e-mail]
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Assistant Attorney General
Michigan Attorney General Office
Corporate Oversight Division
525 West Ottawa Street, 6th Floor
Lansing, MI 48933
Telephone: [phone]

-2-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE
TO RESPOND TO DEFS MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS

1

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Michigan

2
By:

7

/s/ Douglas L. Davis
Douglas L. Davis
[e-mail]
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Assistant Attorney General
West Virginia Attorney General Office
812 Quarrier St., First Floor
Charleston, WV 25301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Counsel for Plaintiff State of West Virginia

3
4
5
6

9
By:

14

/s/ Gwendolyn J. Cooley
Gwendolyn J. Cooley
[e-mail]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Assistant Attorney General
Wisconsin Department of Justice
PO Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707
Telephone: [phone]
Facsmilie: [phone]

15

Counsel for Plaintiff State of Wisconsin

10
11
12
13

16
FILER’S ATTESTATION

17

The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the signatories thereto has been

18
19

obtained.

20
[PROPOSED] ORDER

21

Under the parties’ stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24

Dated:

5/2

, 2012

By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
Case Nos. 10-cv-3517 SI; 10-cv-3619
Case No. M 07-1827 SI

-3-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE
TO RESPOND TO DEFS MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS